Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

equity kicker

Read a random definition: Office of Private Sector Liaison

A quick definition of equity kicker:

Equity kicker: When someone lends money for a project, they might ask to become part owner of the project too. This is called equity participation or an equity kicker.

A more thorough explanation:

Equity kicker is a term used in finance that refers to a type of equity participation. It is a condition where a lender is given a share in the ownership of a project as a requirement for granting a loan. This means that the lender will receive a portion of the profits or gains from the project in addition to the interest on the loan.

Let's say a real estate developer wants to build a new apartment complex but needs a loan to finance the project. The lender may require an equity kicker as a condition for granting the loan. This means that the lender will receive a percentage of the ownership in the apartment complex and will share in the profits from the project.

For example, if the lender requires a 10% equity kicker, they will receive 10% ownership in the apartment complex and will share in 10% of the profits. If the project is successful and generates a profit of $1 million, the lender will receive $100,000 in addition to the interest on the loan.

Another example is a startup company that needs funding to grow its business. The investor may require an equity kicker as a condition for investing in the company. This means that the investor will receive a share in the ownership of the company and will share in the profits or gains from the company's success.

Overall, an equity kicker is a way for lenders or investors to mitigate their risk and increase their potential returns by sharing in the ownership and profits of a project or company.

equity jurisprudence | equity loan

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.