Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

error-of-judgment rule

Read a random definition: insufficient evidence

A quick definition of error-of-judgment rule:

The error-of-judgment rule is a legal principle that says a professional is not responsible for giving advice or an opinion that turns out to be wrong, as long as they acted in good faith and believed it was in the client's best interest. This means that if a professional makes a mistake in their judgment or analysis of a situation that is not clear, they may not be held liable for any resulting harm. For example, a lawyer who makes a mistake in a trial strategy that involves an unclear area of the law may not be sued for malpractice if they acted in good faith. This principle is also called judgmental immunity.

A more thorough explanation:

The error-of-judgment rule is a doctrine that protects professionals from liability for advice or opinions given in good faith and with an honest belief that the advice was in the client's best interests, but that was based on a mistake either in judgment or in analyzing an unsettled area of the professional's business.

For example, an attorney who makes an error in trial tactics involving an unsettled area of the law may, under certain circumstances, defeat a malpractice claim arising from the tactical error. This means that if the attorney acted in good faith and believed that their tactics were in the best interest of their client, they may not be held liable for any negative outcome resulting from the error.

The error-of-judgment rule is important because it allows professionals to make decisions based on their expertise and experience without fear of being sued for every mistake they make. However, it is not a blanket protection and only applies in certain circumstances where the professional acted in good faith and with an honest belief that their actions were in the best interest of their client.

error of fact | error of law

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.