Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

estoppel in pais

Read a random definition: confirmation of sale

A quick definition of estoppel in pais:

Estoppel in pais is a way to stop someone from using a right against another person if they got that right by tricking or misleading the other person. This is to make sure that people don't use the law to take advantage of others. For example, if someone lies to their partner and makes them think they are married, they can't later say they aren't married to keep from splitting their things in a divorce. Different states have different rules for when estoppel in pais can be used, but usually the person who was tricked has to have relied on the lies and been hurt by them.

A more thorough explanation:

Estoppel in pais, also known as equitable estoppel, is a legal defense that prevents a person from using a right against another person when that right arises from misleading actions. This doctrine was created to prevent someone from taking unfair advantage of another person through legal means.

For example, if someone leads their partner to believe that they are legally married, they cannot later use the illegitimacy of the marriage as an argument against splitting property in a divorce proceeding. This is because the partner relied on the misleading conduct of the other person and suffered harm as a result.

The requirements for estoppel in pais vary by state, but generally, the party claiming the right must have knowingly misled the other party, the other party must have relied on that conduct, and the other party must have suffered some harm. Some states require a higher standard of willful conduct, while others allow negligence to be sufficient for misleading someone. Additionally, the person using the estoppel defense must have reasonably relied on the misleading conduct of the other party.

Overall, estoppel in pais is a legal defense that prevents someone from using a right that arises from misleading conduct. This doctrine is meant to protect individuals from being taken advantage of through legal means.

estoppel by silence | et al.

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 4 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
17:06
I was a one issue voter. My one fucking issue was that Trump encouraged an insurrection.
texaslawhopefully
17:07
That's all anyone should've needed.
17:07
i am a 1 issue voter: national debt.
jackfrost11770
17:07
THERES A COP FUNERAL AND NOW THE BUSES ARENT RUNNING TO MY PLACE SO I HAVE TO WALK IN THE FREEZING COLD HOME
texaslawhopefully
17:07
Not to mention that he's completely thrown away liberalism and classic western political philosophy, but yk your eggs will be cheaper so it's worth it
how bad are these tariffs gonna get for us everyday consumers?
@jackfrost11770: FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUu
jackfrost11770
17:08
FUCK THE NYPD
WASP HAHAHAHAHHA
texaslawhopefully
17:08
Estimates are about 4k fruitbat
YRDSL
17:08
im a 1 issue voter - if i want someone to be elected i vote for them
woof
texaslawhopefully
17:08
I've seen some that could be as high as 7k though
17:08
@jackfrost11770: ya prolly don't buy any lotto tickets tonite
get on that trump coin before the rug pull lol
Dkk
17:09
@BigStrongBug: I don't consider myself a one issue voter but if I had to pick one it would be gender relations.
i am a one issue voter for the economy, which is why i voted harris
texaslawhopefully
17:10
Here's a fairly well respected estimate fruitybat: The proposed tariffs could cost consumers an additional $2,500 to $7,600 a year per household, according to estimates, said Jonathan Gold, vice president of supply chain and customs policy for the National Retail Federation.
i am a voter so i voted
17:11
Lol what does gender relations mean
17:11
Like are you anti gay marriage?
texaslawhopefully
17:11
@Dkk: So you care about gender relations over the Constitution, institutional stability, the economy, political norms, etc.?
blue collar trump voters are gonna blame anything but him anyway when the price of their household consumption goes through the roof. I wonder how they'll spin that narrative.
17:11
Or are you an all inclusive hater and include trans folks too
texaslawhopefully
17:12
Even if you have conservative social values you still shouldn't like Trump lol, but that's a whole diff convo
I love when people prefer putting not talking about gender in schools at the top of the agenda instead of dealing with school shootings
this is going to blow your mind but once you realize women and men are more similar than different you will drown in pussy or dick
17:12
@HopefullyInLawSchool: $45k @ KS is really good. $145k is to attend it is not a bad deal
facts knowledgeable
Also love how he put an EO to leave the Paris climate agreement in the midst of the LA wildfires and places who haven’t gotten snow in 15 years now getting storms
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.