Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

ex justa causa

Read a random definition: Usage of trade

A quick definition of ex justa causa:

Ex Justa Causa: This is a Latin term that means "from a just or lawful cause" or "by a just or legal title." It refers to something that is done for a good reason or with the right authority.

Ex Justitia: This is another Latin term that means "from justice" or "as a matter of justice." It refers to something that is done because it is fair and right.

Exlegalitas: This is a Law Latin term that has two meanings. First, it can refer to outlawry, which means being outside the law's protection. Second, it can refer to a person who is prosecuted as an outlaw.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: From a just or lawful cause; by a just or legal title.

Example: A person who is fired from their job for violating company policy has been terminated ex justa causa.

This means that the termination was justified and legal because the person broke the rules of their employment. The employer had a just or lawful cause for terminating the employee.

Definition: From justice; as a matter of justice.

Example: A judge may sentence a criminal to prison time ex justitia.

This means that the judge is sentencing the criminal as a matter of justice, based on the severity of the crime committed. The sentence is not arbitrary or unfair, but rather is based on what is just and right according to the law.

Definition: Outlawry; outside the law's protection.

Example: In medieval times, a person who was declared an outlaw was considered exlegalitas.

This means that the person was outside the protection of the law and could be punished or even killed without consequence. The term exlegalitas is not commonly used in modern legal contexts.

ex jure representationis | exlegare

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 4 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
17:07
That's all anyone should've needed.
17:07
i am a 1 issue voter: national debt.
jackfrost11770
17:07
THERES A COP FUNERAL AND NOW THE BUSES ARENT RUNNING TO MY PLACE SO I HAVE TO WALK IN THE FREEZING COLD HOME
texaslawhopefully
17:07
Not to mention that he's completely thrown away liberalism and classic western political philosophy, but yk your eggs will be cheaper so it's worth it
how bad are these tariffs gonna get for us everyday consumers?
@jackfrost11770: FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUu
jackfrost11770
17:08
FUCK THE NYPD
WASP HAHAHAHAHHA
texaslawhopefully
17:08
Estimates are about 4k fruitbat
YRDSL
17:08
im a 1 issue voter - if i want someone to be elected i vote for them
woof
texaslawhopefully
17:08
I've seen some that could be as high as 7k though
17:08
@jackfrost11770: ya prolly don't buy any lotto tickets tonite
get on that trump coin before the rug pull lol
Dkk
17:09
@BigStrongBug: I don't consider myself a one issue voter but if I had to pick one it would be gender relations.
i am a one issue voter for the economy, which is why i voted harris
texaslawhopefully
17:10
Here's a fairly well respected estimate fruitybat: The proposed tariffs could cost consumers an additional $2,500 to $7,600 a year per household, according to estimates, said Jonathan Gold, vice president of supply chain and customs policy for the National Retail Federation.
i am a voter so i voted
17:11
Lol what does gender relations mean
17:11
Like are you anti gay marriage?
texaslawhopefully
17:11
@Dkk: So you care about gender relations over the Constitution, institutional stability, the economy, political norms, etc.?
blue collar trump voters are gonna blame anything but him anyway when the price of their household consumption goes through the roof. I wonder how they'll spin that narrative.
17:11
Or are you an all inclusive hater and include trans folks too
texaslawhopefully
17:12
Even if you have conservative social values you still shouldn't like Trump lol, but that's a whole diff convo
I love when people prefer putting not talking about gender in schools at the top of the agenda instead of dealing with school shootings
this is going to blow your mind but once you realize women and men are more similar than different you will drown in pussy or dick
17:12
@HopefullyInLawSchool: $45k @ KS is really good. $145k is to attend it is not a bad deal
facts knowledgeable
Also love how he put an EO to leave the Paris climate agreement in the midst of the LA wildfires and places who haven’t gotten snow in 15 years now getting storms
@llama: it would only be 17,000 ish per year
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.