Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

executed consideration

Read a random definition: reissuable note

A quick definition of executed consideration:

Executed consideration is something that has already been given or done in exchange for a promise. It can be an act, a forbearance, or a return promise that motivates a person to engage in a legal act. Consideration is necessary for an agreement to be enforceable. It must be fair and reasonable under the circumstances of the agreement. Past consideration, or something given, done, or suffered in the past which purportedly supports a subsequent promise, is not considered valid consideration. Valuable consideration is something of value given or promised by one party in exchange for the promise of the other. In parliamentary law, consideration is the process by which a deliberative assembly disposes of a motion.

A more thorough explanation:

Executed consideration is a type of consideration in contract law that refers to consideration that has already been given. Consideration is something of value that is exchanged between parties in a contract. It can be an act, a forbearance, or a return promise. Executed consideration is different from executory consideration, which is consideration that is promised to be given in the future.

For example, if John promises to pay Jane $500 for painting his house, and Jane has already completed the painting, then the consideration is executed. The act of painting the house is the consideration that Jane has already given, and the promise to pay $500 is the consideration that John has given.

Another example of executed consideration is when a person pays for a product or service. The payment is the executed consideration, and the product or service is the consideration that the other party has given.

exeat | executed contract

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.