Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

false light

Read a random definition: nonoccupier

A quick definition of false light:

False light is when someone spreads lies about another person that are really hurtful and offensive. This can make the person feel really bad and upset. It's like when someone tells a big lie about you to lots of people and it's not true. False light is different from defamation, which is when someone lies about you and it hurts your reputation. False light is more about how the lies make you feel inside. Sometimes, it's easier to prove false light than defamation because you just have to show that the lies were really mean and hurtful to most people.

A more thorough explanation:

False light is a type of invasion of privacy where someone spreads lies about another person that would be considered offensive to most people. This can cause emotional harm to the person being lied about.

To prove false light, the person who was lied about must show that:

  • The person spreading the lies did it on purpose or was reckless
  • The lies were made publicly
  • The lies were highly offensive
  • The lies caused personal harm, like emotional distress

False light is similar to defamation, which is also about spreading lies. But false light is more about emotional harm, while defamation is more about harm to a person's reputation.

For example, if someone spreads a rumor that a person is a thief, and that rumor is not true, it could be considered false light. This is because being called a thief is highly offensive and could cause emotional harm to the person being lied about.

Another example could be if someone spreads a rumor that a person is gay, and that rumor is not true. This could be considered false light because being outed as gay could be highly offensive and cause emotional harm to the person being lied about.

These examples illustrate how false light can cause emotional harm to a person and why it is considered a type of invasion of privacy.

false imprisonment | false pretenses

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
just tell them you're applying to monsters university
13:34
as far as i know, that information is simply for data collection purposes
^
13:34
i don't think it has a detrimental effect on your chances of admission
13:34
but also you don't need to tell them anything so lol
Can y'all help me understand something lol. What does it mean for an app to "go complete"? Is that when the school has reviewed it and made a decision?
13:35
Na, it's when they have all the required information
Gotcha. So what would be the difference between received and completed?
Does complete entail like the app + LORs?
13:35
correct
That makes sense. Thank you!
13:36
complete basically means they've acknowledged receipt and it's ready to go under review whenever they start the deliberative process
Quillinit
13:40
I still haven't had Chicago or Cornell go complete, but I think that's just how they be
13:41
when did you submit
CaringEquableGuppy
13:42
How do you know when an application is complete? Is it on LSAC or the school's portal?
13:43
it'll be on the school-specific portal
Quillinit
13:44
when they opened
Quillinit
13:45
they both say something along the lines of "received and waiting to be processed"
13:48
anyone have good resources for revising a personal statement for reuse after applying with it last cycle?
13:49
Any guesses when Cornell and Penn CRS fee waivers will go out?
13:51
@Quillinit: from my recollection, chicago and cornell collapse complete/UR1 into a single step, so they may simply not be ready to begin reviewing applications
13:52
i think it's fair to assume, barring a handful of schools like UVA, most schools won't begin reviewing applications in earnest until the beginning of next month at the earliest, so it wouldn't be surprising to hear that applications are just sitting in the queue
13:54
@oakenrays: I was just gonna write a new one personally but I think you want to make it recognizably different from your previous PS
13:56
@baddestbunny: definitely agree that some revision and additional information is warranted but, my why law is the same... I guess just tell the same story in a different way
14:03
ugh fineeee I'll write a new stupid essay
14:07
yeah I told my last essay about a formative experience and am trying to update it now to be about what I’ve learned since that experience
recently wrapped up interview
i re-wrote my PS this cycle when I reapplied
fire drill at work
so lit
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.