Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

family purpose doctrine

Read a random definition: canon law

A quick definition of family purpose doctrine:

The family purpose doctrine means that if someone in a family uses a car and causes damage, the owner of the car is responsible for paying for the damage. Even if the owner didn't give permission for the family member to use the car, they are still responsible because they should have control over their car like they do with a dangerous thing like a gun. The owner needs to make sure their family members use the car safely or not at all. Different states have different rules about who counts as "family" for this rule.

A more thorough explanation:

The family purpose doctrine is a legal concept that holds a vehicle owner responsible for any damages caused by their family members while using their vehicle. This means that even if the owner did not give permission for the family member to use the vehicle, they can still be held liable for any harm caused.

The reason for this doctrine is that vehicles, like firearms, can be dangerous and cause harm if not used responsibly. Therefore, the owner of the vehicle is responsible for ensuring that their family members use the vehicle in a safe and responsible manner.

The family purpose doctrine varies by state, but it typically applies to parents and their children. Some states may also extend the doctrine to include non-family members who use the vehicle with the owner's permission.

Let's say that John owns a car and his son, Tim, takes the car without permission and gets into an accident, causing damage to another car and injuring the driver. Even though John did not give Tim permission to use the car, he can still be held liable for the damages and injuries caused by Tim under the family purpose doctrine.

Another example could be if Sarah owns a van and allows her friend, Lisa, to borrow it for a weekend trip. If Lisa gets into an accident during the trip, Sarah could still be held liable for any damages or injuries caused by Lisa under the family purpose doctrine.

These examples illustrate how the family purpose doctrine holds vehicle owners responsible for the actions of their family members or others who use their vehicle with permission. It emphasizes the importance of responsible vehicle ownership and ensuring that those who use the vehicle do so in a safe and responsible manner.

family pot trust | Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act of 2009

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
14:42
just so u guys know diamonds are a scam, very plentiful on earth, much less valuable than silver, plat, gold. junk rock
JumpySubsequentDolphin
14:44
big lab grown fan llama?
14:44
literally just carbon either way. sure they are pretty but they are dependable.
14:46
i appreciate the beauty of both, im just having an autis rant srry
JumpySubsequentDolphin
14:46
lab grown’s not very expensive tho
JumpySubsequentDolphin
14:46
depending on the size i guess
JumpySubsequentDolphin
14:46
more ethical too
there are lab grown diamonds and child labor diamonds
i prefer child labor diamonds for their authenticity
14:49
I only buy real diamonds if i get a polaroid of the child who harvested it to authenticate the rock
14:50
ok players I g2g. but if u want to oogle over some jewelry: https://www.youtube.com/@TraxNYCDiamondJewelry is my favorite
jackfrost11770
14:55
can reddit users please learn that when you post an instagram link it'll share your profile with anyone that opens it
jackfrost11770
14:55
so much self doxxing constantly happening on lsa 💀
16:51
😛
put your tongue away
Dkk
17:38
I buy a bowling ball for my woman when I want their ring size. That's been my strategy in the past.
Dkk
17:40
Oh shit, I posted Instagram here once. I doxed myself then too lmfao.
18:11
when should i hear back if I applied 12/13 to cardozo, st johns, hofstra, nyls, brooklyn, and umiami - anyone else hear back and applied mid december ?
probably like sometime in march
Dkk
19:18
@getmoney: check the charts. We have already given you an answer multiple times.
20:09
relax, what chart
20:29
Go to the school, Hofstra for example. Set the cycle to last year and sort the chart by date submitted. You can see when people who applied in December heard back last cycle
helloo everyone, does someone want to read one paragraph i wrote for GW law for the diversoty statement and tell me if it is good/bad?
In school, I was met with questions like, “Why are Muslim women oppressed?” or “Do you need bodyguards when you travel to Jordan?”
shoudl i keep those questions in there or is too much?
texaslawhopefully
22:44
I would cut the questions and go in media res.
texaslawhopefully
22:45
But, I guess it also depends on what the next few paragraphs are like. I personally am not a fan of rhetorical questions, as they're generally not well done, but they could work.
I like the questions but maybe italics instead of quotes so it feels more internal
like quotes are so blocky and chunky sometimes whereas italics feels more like seamless thoughts but I think that only works if it matches your writing style! I used rhetoricals in mine that way and it seems to have been working out okay
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.