Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

first impression

Read a random definition: licentious

A quick definition of first impression:

First impression: When a new legal issue comes up in court that has never been decided before, it's called a first impression. This means there is no previous decision to follow, so the court has to figure out what to do on its own. Sometimes, the court will look at what other courts have done in similar situations to help make a decision.

A more thorough explanation:

First impression is a legal term used to describe a situation where a court is faced with a new issue or interpretation that has not been addressed before. This means that there is no existing legal precedent or authority on the matter.

For example, if a court is presented with a case that involves a new law that has just been passed, it may be a case of first impression. Similarly, if a court is presented with a case that involves an issue that has not been addressed within its jurisdiction, it may also be a case of first impression.

When a court is faced with a case of first impression, it may seek guidance from other jurisdictions or make analogies to related or similar issues. This is because there is no existing legal authority to rely on.

For instance, in the case of Fiore v. White, 562 Pa. 634, the court held that a case of first impression is one that presents an "entirely novel question of law" that "cannot be governed by any existing precedent". This means that the court had to rely on its own judgment and reasoning to come up with a decision.

Overall, a case of first impression is an important legal concept that highlights the need for courts to carefully consider new issues and interpretations that have not been addressed before.

first degree murder | fiscal sponsor

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.