Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

first-to-file rule

Read a random definition: Habeas Corpus Act

A quick definition of first-to-file rule:

The first-to-file rule is a legal principle that says when two parties bring the same case to two different courts, the court that receives the case first gets to keep it. The second court usually stops its proceedings. However, if the first case was filed only to prevent the other party from filing, it is not allowed. This is called anticipatory filing. It is used to determine things like where the case will be heard.

A more thorough explanation:

The first-to-file rule is a principle in civil procedure that states that when two parties file lawsuits regarding the same issues in two courts with proper jurisdiction, the court that first acquires jurisdiction usually retains the case, excluding the other court. The court with the second-filed lawsuit typically stays proceedings or abstains.

However, there is an exception to this rule if the first-filed lawsuit is brought in anticipation of the true plaintiff's lawsuit and is an improper attempt at forum-shopping. This is known as anticipatory filing.

For example, if Company A and Company B both file lawsuits against each other in different courts regarding a patent infringement issue, the court that first acquires jurisdiction will usually retain the case. If Company A filed their lawsuit first, the court where they filed will handle the case, and the court where Company B filed will stay proceedings or abstain.

However, if Company A filed their lawsuit merely in anticipation of Company B's lawsuit, and it is an improper attempt at forum-shopping, the court may not follow the first-to-file rule and may instead dismiss Company A's lawsuit.

first taker | first-to-file system

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.