Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

fiscus

Read a random definition: free alongside ship

A quick definition of fiscus:

Term: FISCUS

Definition: Fiscus means the moneybag or treasury. In ancient Rome, it was the emperor's treasury, and later it became the treasury of the state. It can also refer to the treasury of a monarch, noble, or private person. Fiscus is different from Hanaper, which refers to the private property of the monarch.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Fiscus (fis-kus) is a Latin term that means "the basket" or "moneybag." It has three main definitions:

  1. In Roman law, it referred to the emperor's treasury. Later on, it also included the treasury of the state, which was called Aerarium.
  2. In history, it referred to the treasury of a monarch, noble, or any private person. This was where forfeited property was kept.
  3. It can also refer to the treasury or property of the state, which is different from the private property of the monarch. This is similar to Hanaper.

Examples:

  • During the Roman Empire, the fiscus was where all the taxes and tributes collected from the provinces were kept. This money was used to fund the emperor's expenses and the military.
  • In medieval Europe, the fiscus of a monarch was where all the confiscated property of criminals and rebels was kept. This property was often sold to raise money for the monarch's treasury.
  • Today, the fiscus of a state refers to the government's treasury or budget. This is where taxes and other revenues are collected and used to fund public services and projects.

The examples illustrate how the term fiscus has been used throughout history to refer to different types of treasuries or budgets. In each case, it is a place where money or property is kept and used to fund various expenses.

fiscal year | fishery

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.