Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

FOB

Read a random definition: tax-deferred

A quick definition of FOB:

FOB: This is a term used in shipping. It means that the seller is responsible for getting the goods to a certain point, usually a port or airport. Once the goods are at that point, the buyer takes over and is responsible for getting them to their final destination. It's like a relay race, where one person passes the baton to the next person.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: FOB stands for Free on Board. It is a shipping term that indicates who is responsible for the goods during transportation and when the ownership of the goods is transferred from the seller to the buyer.

For example, if a seller agrees to sell a product to a buyer FOB shipping point, it means that the buyer is responsible for the goods once they leave the seller's warehouse. The buyer will also be responsible for any damages or losses that occur during transportation. On the other hand, if the seller agrees to sell the product FOB destination, it means that the seller is responsible for the goods until they reach the buyer's warehouse.

Another example is when a company orders a large quantity of goods from a supplier overseas. The supplier may offer FOB shipping terms, which means that the supplier will be responsible for the goods until they are loaded onto the ship. Once the goods are on the ship, the buyer will be responsible for any damages or losses that occur during transportation.

These examples illustrate how FOB terms can impact the responsibility and ownership of goods during transportation. It is important for buyers and sellers to understand these terms to avoid any misunderstandings or disputes.

FMLA | follow-on offering

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.