Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

follow-the-settlements doctrine

Read a random definition: mensor

A quick definition of follow-the-settlements doctrine:

The follow-the-settlements doctrine is a rule in insurance that says the company that provides insurance must agree with the decisions made by the person or company they are insuring when it comes to settling claims. This means that if the person or company being insured decides to settle a claim, the insurance company must follow their decision. The same rule applies to reinsurers, who must follow the actions of the reinsured.

A more thorough explanation:

The follow-the-settlements doctrine is a principle in insurance that requires an indemnitor to accept and agree with the actions taken by the indemnitee in settling claims. This principle is particularly relevant in reinsurance, where a reinsurer must follow the actions of the reinsured.

Suppose a primary insurer settles a claim with a policyholder for $100,000. The reinsurer, who has agreed to cover a portion of the risk, must accept the settlement and pay their share of the claim. Even if the reinsurer disagrees with the settlement amount, they are bound by the follow-the-settlements doctrine and must honor the decision of the primary insurer.

Another example could be a situation where a policyholder sues an insurance company for damages. If the insurance company decides to settle the case out of court, the reinsurer must accept the settlement and pay their share of the settlement amount.

These examples illustrate how the follow-the-settlements doctrine works in practice. It ensures that all parties involved in an insurance contract are held accountable for their actions and decisions, and that the risk is shared fairly among them.

follow-the-fortunes doctrine | fons juris

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
10:09
@llama: RandR is a fucking joke, dont do it alejandro AI lmfao
noreaster
11:06
I genuinely do think being a reapplicant has some influence on a school’s perception of you, like we didn’t want this person before so why would we want them now? If you apply to only a couple schools your first cycle and then reapply with a higher LSAT and apply more broadly you will prob have good odds at the schools you didn’t apply to before
11:24
LMFAO why wait a year to go form UGA to chicago? You make the same biglaw salary lmfao you can get the same elite pi if you finish high, which you should if you are capable of getting chicago with a r and r. This means you advocate them not earning what they could over 4 years - 90k and study then 3 years of law or 3 years of law and then 260k salary? lmfao r and r only makes sense for FC
11:25
If someone applied with a 155 and can get a 170, a lot diff than a 168 hoping for a 172 and wasting a whole year for that
11:25
Oh i know i know i know
11:26
BUt if you want 171 r and r to get a 176+ for top FC at the top schools? okay. Everything else? Take your t25.
11:26
Scholarship dollars? Tuition + 90k income is the same or slightly less than the big law salary, but without a year of career progression.
11:27
It is not a smart move to r and r, long story short, despite what people who want you to pay for essay review and lsat tutor and lsat tutor service say
noreaster
11:58
The other point I would make is that with medians rising your 3.92 GPA might be above median at your dream school one year and below the next
13:20
Both of you make valid points, but if you do not get off the W/L your only options are to R&R or just not pursue. So yea if it makes sense and you can go this year, it may be better than R&R in hopes of better prospects next yr. the devil you know is better than the angel you don't where devil is this cycle and angel is next cycel
i don't think reapplying is going to hurt you from a previously WL/denied school
just make sure you're coming with new things on your resume. maybe a higher lsat or some work experience. a school may not of wanted you this cycle, but if you come back with stronger stats, you're gonna be what they might be looking for.
overall, i'd say work on boosting your lsat though!!
14:18
These decision times are so long, its crazy how I have to put in a deposit without knowing a couple of decisions
14:19
"rolling admissions" will haunt me forever
noreaster
11:05
good way of showing fluctuations over time
MrThickRopes
11:11
Easter waves TD?
Real
checking anyways
17:54
@MrThickRopes: not likely
MrThickRopes
19:01
You was right
Jacobdoeshisbest
19:17
Anyone here go to ookla for undergrad?
MrThickRopes
21:01
Type shit type shit
Morning sluts, heard they doing big CLS and, idk let's say berkeley, waves this week
noreaster
9:22
my bitches shakin ass with they hand out
Gotta get a scholarship somehow
Also, are you gonna eat that carrot?
Mostlylegal
9:31
hope everyone had a wonderful easter!
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.