Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

gerrymander

Read a random definition: mutuality of parties

A quick definition of gerrymander:

Definition: Gerrymandering is when people draw the lines for voting areas in a way that helps one group win more votes than another. They might make the lines look really weird or strange to do this. It's not fair and some people think it's wrong. The word "gerrymander" comes from a funny picture in a newspaper a long time ago. Sometimes, it's against the law to do this if it's based on race, but it's hard to stop it from happening in other ways.

A more thorough explanation:

Gerrymandering is when political or electoral districts are drawn in a way that gives one political group an advantage over another. This is often done by creating districts with strange or unusual shapes. The term "gerrymander" comes from a political cartoon published in 1813.

For example, imagine a state with 60% of voters who support Party A and 40% who support Party B. If the districts are drawn in a way that splits up the Party A voters into many different districts, while keeping the Party B voters together in a few districts, then Party B could end up winning more seats in the legislature, even though they have fewer overall voters.

Gerrymandering is controversial because it can be used to manipulate election outcomes and goes against the principles of democracy. In some cases, it can even be illegal. For example, if districts are drawn based on race, that violates the Voting Rights Act and is therefore illegal.

Overall, gerrymandering is a way for politicians to try to gain an unfair advantage in elections by manipulating the way districts are drawn.

Georgia Case-Law | Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.