Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Gitlow v. New York (1925)

Read a random definition: civil wrong

A quick definition of Gitlow v. New York (1925):

Gitlow v. New York was a court case where the Supreme Court said that the First Amendment, which protects free speech, also applies to state laws. However, they also said that the government can put some limits on free speech if it's necessary for public safety. But these limits can't be unfair or random.

A more thorough explanation:

Gitlow v. New York is a landmark case in the United States Supreme Court. The case established that the First Amendment right to free speech applied to state laws under the Fourteenth Amendment. This means that the government cannot restrict your freedom of speech just because you live in a certain state.

However, the Supreme Court also ruled that the freedom of speech is not an absolute right. The government can impose reasonable restrictions on your freedom of speech if it believes that such restrictions are necessary for public safety and welfare. For example, the government can restrict speech that incites violence or hate speech that targets a specific group of people.

It is important to note that these restrictions cannot be unreasonable or arbitrary. The government cannot restrict your freedom of speech just because it disagrees with your opinion or because it wants to silence you.

For example, if someone were to give a speech that encourages people to commit acts of violence, the government could restrict that speech because it poses a threat to public safety. However, if someone were to give a speech expressing their political beliefs, the government cannot restrict that speech just because it disagrees with those beliefs.

gift tax | go bail

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.