Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

grantor-retained trust

Read a random definition: decollatio

A quick definition of grantor-retained trust:

A grantor-retained trust is a special type of trust that helps wealthy people reduce the amount of taxes they have to pay when they pass away. The person who creates the trust (called the grantor) gets some money from the trust for a certain number of years, and then the property in the trust goes to someone else without having to pay estate taxes. This type of trust is usually made with things that will grow in value a lot, so that the value of the trust goes up without having to pay taxes on it. There are three different kinds of grantor-retained trusts: annuity trusts, unitrusts, and income trusts.

A more thorough explanation:

A grantor-retained trust is a type of irrevocable trust that is created to reduce estate taxes. It is mostly used by wealthy individuals to limit estate and gift taxes. The grantor receives some form of income from the trust for a set amount of years, and then the property is transferred to a beneficiary free of estate taxes.

There are three main types of grantor-retained trusts:

  • Grantor-Retained Annuity Trusts (GRATs): With a GRAT, the grantor receives a fixed annuity payment from the trust for a set number of years. At the end of the term, the remaining assets in the trust are transferred to the beneficiary.
  • Grantor-Retained Unitrusts (GRUTs): With a GRUT, the grantor receives a percentage of the trust's value each year for a set number of years. At the end of the term, the remaining assets in the trust are transferred to the beneficiary.
  • Grantor-Retained Income Trusts (GRITs): With a GRIT, the grantor receives all of the income generated by the trust for a set number of years. At the end of the term, the remaining assets in the trust are transferred to the beneficiary.

For example, let's say a wealthy individual creates a GRAT and funds it with $1 million worth of stock. The grantor receives a fixed annuity payment of $50,000 per year for 10 years. At the end of the term, any remaining stock in the trust is transferred to the beneficiary free of estate taxes. If the stock has grown in value during the 10-year term, the beneficiary will receive the appreciated value tax-free.

In this way, grantor-retained trusts allow wealthy individuals to transfer assets to their beneficiaries while minimizing estate and gift taxes.

grantor-retained income trust | grantor-retained unitrust

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
16:04
yeah but Schrödinger wasn't really complaining
Mostlylegal
16:04
okay well imagine schrodinger really wants to hang out with his cat, then answer my question
16:06
ya I'd still wanna hear if if the he'd prefer the uncertainty over knowing it died
Mostlylegal
16:07
either way he doesnt get to play with his cat
16:08
yeah true
But the non-observable quantum state of uncertainty implies that both possibilities are simultaneously true
So you have been Accepted and Denied
Use that uno-reverse on them
16:09
logical determinism says otherwise
16:10
but you know that already with your username
16:11
Schrodinger's Application
Mostlylegal
16:13
you should send adcoms a thank you for the admission and also a request for why they rejected you to coincide with your dichotomic understanding of possibilities then
16:15
weirdest thing just happened to me
16:16
i went to hofstra admitted student day and they booked hotel rooms for us and I didn't go to the hotel cuz I had a long drive and wanted to avoid Monday traffic
16:17
and someone from admission's just called me to ask why I didn't go and was like well we still had to pay for you
Let’s assume A(acceptance), R(rejection), D(decision). Although, according to logical determinism, the future event D may have a set truth value of A^R, the function of ^(or) allows for uncertainty because the truth value of a future event D being fixed as A^R (true or false) is just to say ~(~A^~R)—otherwise put as logical determinism can eat me
16:17
i was just like i'm sorry! i wasn't feeling well and she seemed pissed
16:18
weird vibe
Mostlylegal
16:28
@CaliforniaPhilosopher: your translation from language to logic was close, the inclusion of the word "May" actually throws it off. it would actually be best expressed A^R>D. Logical determinism would put the true or false principle in this case on D rather than R or A. A similar confusion would be since A>~R would be ~A>R. this isnt logical since A and R or not the only inputs
Mostlylegal
16:29
fo thirty pm is dedicated to University of Florida inviting me to another information session
Law-Shark
16:31
@nattyalley: Honestly, that's incredibly unprofessional what you did. I would be pissed too. If you can't see why that is, you should not be going to law school at this time.
MrThickRopes
16:31
fo pm ain't shit
MrThickRopes
16:31
@Law-Shark: oooooo what's da teaaa
Law-Shark
16:31
Just read that story. That's so disconnected from how functioning adults operate, it blows my mind.
MrThickRopes
16:31
ohhhhhh
MrThickRopes
16:31
damnnnnnnnn nattyalley thas on you fo sure
Florida too busy celebrating a national championship
Mostlylegal
16:32
had them on my bracket easy money
MrThickRopes
16:33
they splurgin out dem rs nd wls at smu but i din get none
16:38
@Law-Shark: they didn't say we had to go? and if they are willing to buy rooms for a bunch of people. they sent me a res because I was over 50 miles away but I didn't even ask for one
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.