Connection lost
Server error
I feel like I'm in a constant state of 'motion to compel' more sleep.
✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+
Legal Definitions - greenmail
Definition of greenmail
Greenmail refers to a corporate strategy where a company's management or board of directors repurchases a significant block of its own shares from a particular shareholder, typically at a price substantially higher than the current market value. This action is usually taken to prevent that shareholder from launching a hostile takeover, gaining significant control over the company, or otherwise disrupting its operations. Essentially, it's a premium paid to a threatening shareholder to make them cease their activities and sell their shares back to the company.
The term can also describe a situation where a shareholder threatens to file a lawsuit against the company (known as a derivative action) and then seeks a disproportionately large settlement in exchange for dropping the legal threat.
Here are some examples to illustrate greenmail:
Example 1: Preventing a Hostile Takeover
Imagine a large hedge fund, "Vanguard Ventures," begins aggressively acquiring shares of "InnovateTech Inc.," a publicly traded software company. Vanguard Ventures publicly announces its intention to acquire a controlling stake and replace InnovateTech's current CEO and several board members, citing concerns about the company's direction. To avoid this hostile takeover, InnovateTech's board of directors offers to buy back all of Vanguard Ventures' shares at a price 30% above the current market value. Vanguard Ventures accepts the offer, sells its shares back to InnovateTech, and drops its takeover bid.
Explanation: This scenario illustrates greenmail because InnovateTech paid a significant premium (30% above market value) to Vanguard Ventures specifically to prevent a hostile takeover and maintain the existing management and board.
Example 2: Neutralizing Shareholder Influence
"Global Manufacturing Corp." has a long-standing board of directors. A wealthy individual investor, Ms. Eleanor Vance, acquires a substantial but not controlling percentage of Global Manufacturing's stock. Ms. Vance begins publicly criticizing the company's environmental policies and threatens to rally other shareholders to vote out several long-serving board members at the next annual meeting. To avoid this disruptive challenge and maintain stability, Global Manufacturing's board offers to purchase Ms. Vance's entire stake at a premium, significantly above what other shareholders could get on the open market. Ms. Vance agrees, sells her shares, and ceases her campaign against the company.
Explanation: This is an example of greenmail because Global Manufacturing paid an inflated price to Ms. Vance to neutralize her influence and prevent her from disrupting the company's governance and management, even without a full takeover threat.
Example 3: Avoiding a Costly Lawsuit
A minority shareholder in "Green Energy Solutions LLC," Mr. Robert Kim, discovers what he believes are serious conflicts of interest involving the company's CEO and a recent land acquisition. He threatens to file a derivative lawsuit on behalf of Green Energy Solutions against the board of directors, alleging mismanagement and breach of fiduciary duty. Rather than endure a potentially costly, time-consuming, and publicly damaging legal battle, the board of Green Energy Solutions offers to buy out Mr. Kim's shares at a price far exceeding their current market value, contingent on him dropping his lawsuit threat and agreeing not to pursue similar actions.
Explanation: This demonstrates greenmail in the context of a threatened lawsuit. The company paid a disproportionate settlement (an inflated share price) to Mr. Kim to avoid a potentially damaging legal action, which is a form of greenmail.
Simple Definition
Greenmail is a corporate defense strategy where a company repurchases a significant block of its own stock from a hostile shareholder at a price above market value. This tactic is used by the company's board to prevent a threatened hostile takeover or to eliminate the shareholder's unwanted influence. Essentially, the company pays the shareholder to abandon their intentions.