Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

guaranty fund

Read a random definition: de libero passagio

A quick definition of guaranty fund:

A guaranty fund is a special type of fund that is created to help people who have lost their money because a bank has become insolvent. The fund is usually created by collecting money from other banks through assessments. The money collected is then used to pay back the depositors of the insolvent bank. Guaranty funds were created before the federal deposit insurance system was established in 1933, and some states still have them to protect uninsured deposits.

A more thorough explanation:

A guaranty fund is a type of fund that is primarily raised by assessments on banks and used to pay the depositors of an insolvent bank. It is a private deposit-insurance fund that acts as a safety net for depositors in case a bank fails. Guaranty funds were established before the federal-deposit insurance, which began in 1933, and many funds continued until the savings-and-loan crisis in the 1980s.

For example, Massachusetts has a guaranty fund for uninsured deposits (deposits above $100,000) that are not covered by federal-deposit insurance. This fund is used to compensate depositors for their losses in case of a bank failure.

Another example is the client-security fund, which is established by a state or a state bar association to compensate persons for losses that they suffered because of their attorneys' misappropriation of funds or other misconduct.

These examples illustrate how guaranty funds are established to protect depositors and clients from financial losses due to the failure or misconduct of banks or attorneys.

guaranty contract | guaranty letter of credit

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
lilypadfrog
20:31
that seems crazy #tome
texaslawhopefully
20:32
No, at least from the two people I know there that’s false. I think it’s just something like Chicago for conservatives is on par with S whereas for liberals it’s below HYS but above CCNP
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
YRDSL
21:31
@texaslawhopefully: it's pretty funny how even in law journal articles people can't stop confusing Penn with Penn State
texaslawhopefully
21:40
lmfao I didn't even notice that
21:42
Yeah to penn Carey students I’m sure that is a
21:42
Those are fighting words
21:46
@Dkk: one of the most deranged documents i've ever had the displeasure of reading
lilypadfrog
22:03
sometimes I go into fight or flight mode until I get all my work done
i call that locking in
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.