Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

guardianship

Read a random definition: casualty gain

A quick definition of guardianship:

Guardianship is when someone is given the legal responsibility to take care of another person's personal activities or resources because that person cannot do it on their own. This is often used for children when their parents are not available or for adults who have a disability that prevents them from making good decisions. The guardian has to act in the best interests of the person they are taking care of, and if they don't, they can be removed by a court. Different laws apply to guardianship for children and adults, and they vary by state.

A more thorough explanation:

Guardianship is a legal arrangement where one person is given the responsibility to manage the personal activities or resources of another person who cannot do so on their own. This is often used when a child's parents are not available or when an adult has a disability that prevents them from making decisions.

  • A child's grandparents may be appointed as guardians if the child's parents are unable to care for them.
  • An adult with a developmental disability may have a guardian appointed to help them make decisions about their healthcare and finances.

These examples illustrate how guardianship can be used to ensure that someone who is unable to make decisions on their own is still taken care of and protected.

State laws regulate when and how guardianship is used, and the guardian is required to act in the best interests of their ward. If a guardian acts negligently or in their own self-interest, a court can remove them from their role.

guardian of the person | guest statute

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
I
I'm hoping this is the last week of waiting
wait did I accidentally summon USC I was not looking at the update checker when I sent those messages
Mostlylegal
13:22
vandy is april 15th yes, I think they are waiting to hear back from their As to predict yield and then send out more. Likely a wave this friday methinks
Mostlylegal
13:22
ndls* not vandy
Mostlylegal
13:22
vandy is april 23rd if im not mistaken
starfishies
13:22
they have so many a's left though it feels wild to play it like this
starfishies
13:24
tho i think i prefer silence to meaningless holds
Mostlylegal
13:25
yeah im not sure what their thinking is, perhaps they might fill their class manually since they have so many applicants, but the longer you wait the more you are just getting the rest of the t20s scraps (which may be their strategy)
Mostlylegal
13:30
with vandy, in 2020-2021 which is likely the most similar cycle to this one, Vandy gave out 350 As total. Right now we are at 299. So I think there will still be some movement, and quite a few off waitlist
Has anyone heard from Cincinnati lately?
starfishies
13:34
vandy wl translates as an easy r in my brain
Mostlylegal
13:34
1/4th of NDLS As have already been withdrawn, eeps
Mostlylegal
13:35
@starfishies: I think it depends on stats, if ur within target of stats its probably an actual WL, they do take a couple people off their every year
starfishies
13:35
see this is why im confused with them it cant be a net positive strategy to wait until after deposit deadline to pick the other half of your cohort
Mostlylegal
13:36
its also holy week this week so we might not get any movement from them either since friday and thursday are probably days off
i love that we have to psychoanalyze these institutions to get any sort of semblance of clarity on their decision-making
/s
Denny
13:38
44444
Denny
13:38
pm
starfishies
13:39
SOON!!
Mostlylegal
13:40
i think its more general neuroticism trying to find an answer from tea leaves, atleast on my part
Mostlylegal
13:40
Fo PM gone hit tday fosho
Mostlylegal
13:43
what do you guys think his essays were
13:45
aint no may
13:45
way
13:46
umaryland be throwing out full rides to anyone over a 160 lsat you'd have to acitvely try to get an R
eggan
13:47
tbh they probably just recently got the 173 and didnt have it when they applied
eggan
13:47
to get off the UofSC waitlist perhapf
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.