Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

hallazgo

Read a random definition: equitable

A quick definition of hallazgo:

Term: HALLAZGO

Definition: Hallazgo is a Spanish legal term that refers to the discovery and acquisition of property that has no owner. It can also refer to the first person who legally occupies a property.

(Note: This definition is written in simple English for easy understanding.)

A more thorough explanation:

HALLAZGO

Hallazgo (ah-yahz-goh), n. [Spanish]

1. The act of discovering and taking possession of property that has no owner.

2. The first person recognized by law as the rightful owner of the property.

Example 1: A person walking on the beach finds a valuable ring lying on the sand. Since there is no one around to claim it, the person can claim the ring as a hallazgo.

Example 2: A person discovers an abandoned house and decides to move in. If no one else claims ownership, the person can become the hallazgo of the property.

The examples illustrate the concept of hallazgo, which refers to the act of finding and taking possession of property that has no owner. In both examples, the individuals who found the property can claim it as their own because there is no one else who can prove ownership. The law recognizes the first person who takes possession of the property as the rightful owner, which is why they become the hallazgo.

hallage | halle-gemot

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
ill start prepping in january and aim for august lsat or september even. would it look bad if i have 3-4 attempts on my record? I already took it twice and cancelled my first score so im bit worried about that lol
nope lots of people take the lsat 3-4 times
14:59
@VolatileClumsyAcolyte: is it bad: some schools seem to prefer 1 and done vs 2+ takes. Is it better for you? If score much higher- yes. Overall, if it makes sense for u go for it
you might have to write an addendum though, but schools really want higher medians so if they see a big number that's all they honestly care about
14:59
^^^
CLS is my dream school and the only reason I am considering reapplying is to probably score higher and have better chances there, so fingers crossed they're chill about it
15:05
with that targeted goal/ willingness to take a year to improve score, and from what you have said, it seems like a great option to reapply early next cycle w/ a higher score. best of luck!
15:09
guys is there any chance for me to get into T14s? I applied to some but was convinced to apply to the rest, just feel its too late in the cycle for my stats (170 3.68)
more likely than not you make it into at least one t14
15:14
Hey long time no see hahaha, the prob with that is it has the range of up to 172, Im only 170
15:14
If u have the top range at my stats, there's only like 9 ppl who made it into T14s
yeah but it's also including people below your stats
15:15
Yeah, really my issue is deciding whether to R&R or to just take UF law
also if you reduce the top end of lsat to 170, you have a 33% chance at NYU+columbia, 67% at NU, 33 at mich, 40% berk, 40% UCLA, 100% Cornell, and 50% gulc
realistically you would make it into at least one
15:16
I'm still waiting on a bunch of T14 so hopefully those stats are a good indicator
15:16
idk wait it out - if good offer take if no good offer R&R
i dont think you need to R&R im pretty sure you make it into at least one t14
but if you apply earlier its just a lot easier
15:17
thats odd I didn't see those stats, but ok. We talked abt this awhile back and I'm working on Columbia + Berkeley rn then Cornell, probs is I'm not gonna produce good Why X's before the 25th but whatever
https://www.lsd.law/search/cV9E6 this is artificially deflated because it's only below your stats
someone got into harvard and chicago with your stats
15:19
Why is that deflating it? isnt that a better indicator instead of choosing above median LSATs? Genuinely curious just wondering
when stats are close because of the variability you want a little above your stats and a little below to get more data, adcoms arent so finnicky that 2 points on the lsat is make or break unless it puts you above median, and even then 50% are below median so it's not as big of an impact as you might think. the reason the chanceme tool goes a little above and below your stats by default is to capture a more accurate picture
ie your softs/WE/essays might make you more or less competitive than any random applicant and the best way to account for that is to take a little above and a little below
15:21
got it, I was of the mindset that medians are pretty concrete so taking a +2 LSAT score range was just giving me irrelevant data. Thank you
15:21
Def my softs/essays are the strongest part of my application so hoping they shine through
they kind of are but you see with the data here is doesnt really change your chances going from 172 to 170
yeah youll be in a good place for this cycle
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.