Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Hilton doctrine

Read a random definition: tacking

A quick definition of Hilton doctrine:

The Hilton Doctrine is a rule in civil procedure that says if there is a disagreement between people who have an oil-and-gas lease, the people who would lose their rights if the lease is canceled are very important to the case. They are called indispensable parties. This rule comes from a court case called Hilton v. Atlantic Refining Co. in 1964.

A more thorough explanation:

The Hilton Doctrine is a rule in civil procedure that applies to disputes between parties involved in an oil-and-gas lease. According to this doctrine, if a defendant's lease is challenged, royalty owners who would lose their rights if the lease were terminated are considered indispensable parties to the proceeding.

For example, let's say that a company has leased a piece of land for oil and gas exploration. The lease agreement includes a provision that grants a percentage of the profits to the landowner as royalties. If another party challenges the validity of the lease, the Hilton Doctrine would require that the royalty owners be included in the legal proceedings because they have a direct interest in the outcome of the case.

The Hilton Doctrine was established in the case of Hilton v. Atlantic Refining Co., which was heard by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in 1964. The court ruled that the royalty owners were indispensable parties to the case because their rights would be affected by the outcome of the dispute.

hilo settlement | Himalaya clause

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.