Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

hostage

Read a random definition: Agricultural Adjustment Act

A quick definition of hostage:

Hostage: A person who is taken by someone else and held against their will. The person holding the hostage threatens to hurt or kill them if their demands are not met. This is against the law. In times of war, a hostage can also be someone who is taken by the enemy as a way to make sure that an agreement is kept.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: A hostage is an innocent person who is held captive by another person or group. The captor threatens to harm or kill the hostage if their demands are not met. Hostage-taking is a federal crime according to 18 USCA § 1203. In international law, a hostage is a person who is given or taken into an enemy's custody during a time of war. The hostage's freedom or life is used as security for the performance of some agreement made to the enemy by the belligerent power giving the hostage.

1. A bank robber takes hostages during a heist and demands a ransom in exchange for their release.

2. During a war, a soldier from one side is captured by the enemy and held as a hostage until their side agrees to certain terms.

These examples illustrate how a hostage is someone who is taken against their will and used as leverage to achieve a certain goal. In the first example, the captor wants money and is using the hostages as a bargaining chip. In the second example, the captor wants their demands met by the enemy and is using the hostage as a way to ensure compliance.

hospitium | hostelagium

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
U kno even tho their circuit numbers don't compare to other schools, those #s are better than expected tbh
40-50 fed clerks is pretty cool
texaslawhopefully
20:29
That’s fair. Chicago though: https://www.law.uchicago.edu/clerkships
That's sweet. Again tho, unclear with Fedsoc tho. But u sounded like ur willing to go Fedsoc so ur set
lilypadfrog
20:31
yeah Tex is a fedsoc guy iirc
lilypadfrog
20:31
Is it really like no clerkship benefit at Chicago if you’re not conservative?
lilypadfrog
20:31
that seems crazy #tome
texaslawhopefully
20:32
No, at least from the two people I know there that’s false. I think it’s just something like Chicago for conservatives is on par with S whereas for liberals it’s below HYS but above CCNP
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
YRDSL
21:31
@texaslawhopefully: it's pretty funny how even in law journal articles people can't stop confusing Penn with Penn State
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.