Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

ignorantia facti excusat

Read a random definition: cross-collateral clause

A quick definition of ignorantia facti excusat:

Term: IGNORANTIA FACTI EXCUSAT

Definition: Ignorance of fact is an excuse. This means that if someone does something wrong because they didn't know all the facts, they might not be punished for it. However, this doesn't apply if the person should have known better or if they made the same mistake twice. For example, if someone accidentally takes something from a store because they thought it was free, they might not be punished if they return it once they realize their mistake. But if they keep doing it, they can't use ignorance as an excuse anymore.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Ignorance of fact is an excuse; whatever is done under a mistaken impression of a material fact is excused or provides grounds for relief.

This means that if someone does something wrong because they didn't know all the facts, they might not be punished for it. For example, if someone accidentally takes something from a store without paying because they thought it was free, they might not be charged with theft because they didn't know they were supposed to pay for it.

However, this principle doesn't always apply. If someone does something that is still a crime even if they didn't know all the facts, they can still be punished. For example, if someone shoots someone else thinking it's a toy gun, they can still be charged with murder because it's still a crime to kill someone, even if they didn't know the gun was real.

Example: A man is driving down the road and sees a stop sign. He thinks it's a yield sign and doesn't come to a complete stop. A police officer pulls him over and gives him a ticket for running a stop sign. The man argues that he didn't know it was a stop sign, but the officer tells him that "ignorantia facti excusat" doesn't apply in this case because it's still a traffic violation to not come to a complete stop at a stop sign, even if the driver didn't know it was a stop sign.

ignorantia facti | ignorantia juris

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
11:20
Saw a guy that wrote in Biden and he said no retirement for you buddy
1a2b3c4d26z
11:20
@ClockworkBlue: god I hope that's true
if the country was run the same as Mich Law it would be a better place
Imagine if election night was run by an adcom? Like, "yep, we could get the results Friday, or June 2025."
imagine if it was like Berkley applications
1a2b3c4d26z
11:22
Election status: Complete
1a2b3c4d26z
11:22
For months
triplethread
11:23
erection day
soapy
11:23
Shoutout to Robinhood's election bet not resolving until January
triplethread
11:23
is anyone else like certain that trump will win
ambitiouslizard
11:23
he aint winning
triplethread
11:23
i like being a pessimist
ambitiouslizard
11:24
he lost his re-election, why would he win this one?
1a2b3c4d26z
11:25
I have no idea why people have so much beef w berkeley's app
I've been reading a bit about "herding," which is this idea that pollsters are making the race look tied so they look right no matter who wins.
1a2b3c4d26z
11:26
Like... it's a more involved app but you don't have to do it? They're clearly trying to have some self-selection go on
I 100% agree with the self selection, I also am not even close to touching the medians there. However I think the huge PS plus the video and especially the very specific criteria for the why Berkeley essay is pretty crazy
I'm curious, how bold can one be in those videos? Is it worth making a satirical Jason Statham-action short if the adcoms have no sense of humor?
the more risk you take the higher chance of it backfiring
my instinct would be low humor bc if they have such a complex application I would feel hesitant to use a major part of it as a joke. They clearly take their admissions seriously and a joke video might convey the wrong thing at the wrong time. I think that humor is best put into a PS anecdote where it adds some shine to your personality
safe is always better
All good points
triplethread
11:34
@TheAdoptedOne: amazing
I almost did one for Vanderbilt and my idea was to do a documentary-style vid where I and others talked about me like it was an ESPN 30 for 30.
1a2b3c4d26z
11:36
I was risky in maybe one or two of my essays in that some parts read as slightly humorous, but I really tried to suss out the vibe for each school. I feel like Berk and UMich may be more accommodating of a more "out there" approach than other schools I applied to
1a2b3c4d26z
11:37
but that's literally just going off vibes
it looks like Berk vid is in response to a known prompt. My thinking is it may be a counter to AI by getting people to have to respond to what is essentially an essay prompt but on video
"I think really it’s more the USNWR change that emphasizes employment outcomes in school rankings. Schools want to admit people who have the skills to be more likely to land great jobs even more than before, and being a good interviewer is a very important for that. They want to see you have the soft skills." from a reddit comment
1a2b3c4d26z
11:38
One funny thing when talking to lawyers at work is that they will always say how they wish more law schools had interviews to make sure you can like... talk to people and form sentences
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.