Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

ignorantia facti excusat

Read a random definition: donatio inofficiosa

A quick definition of ignorantia facti excusat:

Term: IGNORANTIA FACTI EXCUSAT

Definition: Ignorance of fact is an excuse. This means that if someone does something wrong because they didn't know all the facts, they might not be punished for it. However, this doesn't apply if the person should have known better or if they made the same mistake twice. For example, if someone accidentally takes something from a store because they thought it was free, they might not be punished if they return it once they realize their mistake. But if they keep doing it, they can't use ignorance as an excuse anymore.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Ignorance of fact is an excuse; whatever is done under a mistaken impression of a material fact is excused or provides grounds for relief.

This means that if someone does something wrong because they didn't know all the facts, they might not be punished for it. For example, if someone accidentally takes something from a store without paying because they thought it was free, they might not be charged with theft because they didn't know they were supposed to pay for it.

However, this principle doesn't always apply. If someone does something that is still a crime even if they didn't know all the facts, they can still be punished. For example, if someone shoots someone else thinking it's a toy gun, they can still be charged with murder because it's still a crime to kill someone, even if they didn't know the gun was real.

Example: A man is driving down the road and sees a stop sign. He thinks it's a yield sign and doesn't come to a complete stop. A police officer pulls him over and gives him a ticket for running a stop sign. The man argues that he didn't know it was a stop sign, but the officer tells him that "ignorantia facti excusat" doesn't apply in this case because it's still a traffic violation to not come to a complete stop at a stop sign, even if the driver didn't know it was a stop sign.

ignorantia facti | ignorantia juris

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.