LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

immaterial averment

Read a random definition: armistice

A quick definition of immaterial averment:

Term: IMMATERIAL AVERMENT

Definition: An immaterial averment is a statement that is not relevant or necessary to prove a legal claim. Averment means a positive declaration or statement. So, an immaterial averment is a statement that does not add any value to the case. For example, if someone is suing for breach of contract, stating their favorite color would be an immaterial averment because it has nothing to do with the case.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: An immaterial averment is a statement made in a legal document that is not relevant to the case at hand and does not affect the outcome of the case. Example: In a lawsuit for breach of contract, the plaintiff includes a statement in their complaint that they have a pet dog. This statement is an immaterial averment because it has no bearing on the breach of contract claim. Explanation: The example illustrates that an immaterial averment is a statement that is not necessary or relevant to the legal claim being made. In this case, the fact that the plaintiff has a pet dog has no connection to the breach of contract claim and therefore does not affect the outcome of the case.

IMLS | immaterial fact

General

General chat about the legal profession.

General >T14 Off Topic

👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎

RoaldDahl

16:26

thank you!!!! i hope it means something

pinkandblue

16:31

fart

IrishDinosaur

16:36

Mich R gang lesgooo

AromaticDazzlingLlama

17:19

Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?

HopefullyInLawSchool

17:21

Ya it was sent to all YM applicants

starfishies

17:37

Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet

PoloBoy

17:38

Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month

starfishies

17:38

Wtf

starfishies

17:39

and the deadline is in like a week what is this

DashingThroughRaindrops

18:01

any cardozo movement?

BatmanBeyond

18:01

Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response

BatmanBeyond

18:02

This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache

DashingThroughRaindrops

18:02

loci already?

BatmanBeyond

18:09

If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers

ChuChuB

12:11

I got the same NDLS email

OrangeThing

12:18

I think the user profiles are broken

HippoDad

19:29

Any word out of Notre Dame?

HippoDad

19:29

Only the invitation to apply for LSE

HippoDad

19:29

Anyone received a decision from NDLS?

bigfatsloth

19:50

when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet

folkmore

0:30

how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?

BroadMotionlessStingray

5:02

Right. Broken links smh

mastermonkey45

11:40

I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.

EmptyFlakyGoose

12:08

The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?

bigfatsloth

13:18

i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march

CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage

13:24

@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)

steelrift99

14:30

Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back

TabooHomelyCrane

16:31

Give it 4 more weeks at least. Everyone in this chat needs to wait longer.

TrumpSucks

19:58

@steelrift99: Same for me at Arizona

TrumpSucks

20:00

It is frustrating when people are admitted who applied after you. But that’s just part of the game I guess

LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.