Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

immoral subject matter

Read a random definition: loan association

A quick definition of immoral subject matter:

Immoral subject matter refers to things that are considered wrong or bad by society. For example, some inventions may not be useful or may be harmful, and therefore cannot be patented. In the past, patents were also denied for things like gambling devices and fake medicines. Similarly, trademarks cannot be registered if they are scandalous or offensive. While these rules are not used as often today, they still exist to prevent people from profiting off of things that are considered immoral.

A more thorough explanation:

Immoral subject matter refers to inventions or trademarks that are considered socially unacceptable or lacking in beneficial use.

  • Patents: Inventions that promote illegal or harmful activities, such as gambling devices or fraudulent products, may be denied patents. However, this doctrine is rarely used today.
  • Trademarks: Scandalous subject matter, such as offensive language or explicit imagery, may be denied trademark protection.

These examples illustrate how the law seeks to prevent the promotion of socially unacceptable or harmful activities through patents and trademarks. By denying protection to such subject matter, the law aims to discourage their use and promote socially beneficial inventions and trademarks.

immoral contract | immovable

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
@TheAdoptedOne: that is called "Dean Poker Night" lol
@ClockworkBlue: I feel like most people could train for the 40 for the same amount of time as they do the LSAT and get close to sub 5 which would be equivalent to a 167+
this is like the schizophrenic posts JJK tik tok be putting out
powerscaling Law School deans up next
11:19
Election Day election day
Write in Dean Z vote
11:20
Saw a guy that wrote in Biden and he said no retirement for you buddy
1a2b3c4d26z
11:20
@ClockworkBlue: god I hope that's true
if the country was run the same as Mich Law it would be a better place
Imagine if election night was run by an adcom? Like, "yep, we could get the results Friday, or June 2025."
imagine if it was like Berkley applications
1a2b3c4d26z
11:22
Election status: Complete
1a2b3c4d26z
11:22
For months
triplethread
11:23
erection day
soapy
11:23
Shoutout to Robinhood's election bet not resolving until January
triplethread
11:23
is anyone else like certain that trump will win
ambitiouslizard
11:23
he aint winning
triplethread
11:23
i like being a pessimist
ambitiouslizard
11:24
he lost his re-election, why would he win this one?
1a2b3c4d26z
11:25
I have no idea why people have so much beef w berkeley's app
I've been reading a bit about "herding," which is this idea that pollsters are making the race look tied so they look right no matter who wins.
1a2b3c4d26z
11:26
Like... it's a more involved app but you don't have to do it? They're clearly trying to have some self-selection go on
I 100% agree with the self selection, I also am not even close to touching the medians there. However I think the huge PS plus the video and especially the very specific criteria for the why Berkeley essay is pretty crazy
I'm curious, how bold can one be in those videos? Is it worth making a satirical Jason Statham-action short if the adcoms have no sense of humor?
the more risk you take the higher chance of it backfiring
my instinct would be low humor bc if they have such a complex application I would feel hesitant to use a major part of it as a joke. They clearly take their admissions seriously and a joke video might convey the wrong thing at the wrong time. I think that humor is best put into a PS anecdote where it adds some shine to your personality
safe is always better
All good points
triplethread
11:34
@TheAdoptedOne: amazing
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.