Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

impermissible comment on the evidence

Read a random definition: surprise

A quick definition of impermissible comment on the evidence:

Impermissible Comment on the Evidence: This means that someone is not allowed to say something about the evidence that is not true or that is not allowed in court. It's like when you're playing a game and someone tries to cheat by saying they have more points than they really do. That's not allowed and it's not fair.

Impersonation: This is when someone pretends to be someone else. It's like when you play dress-up and pretend to be a superhero or a princess. But sometimes people pretend to be someone else to trick other people, and that's not okay. It's like if someone pretended to be a police officer to make you do something you didn't want to do. That's against the law.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Impermissible comment on the evidence refers to making statements or remarks about evidence that are not allowed in court. This includes making personal opinions or assumptions about the evidence, which can influence the jury's decision.

Example: During a trial, a lawyer says to the jury, "In my opinion, the defendant is guilty because the evidence clearly shows that he committed the crime." This is an impermissible comment on the evidence because the lawyer is expressing a personal opinion about the evidence, which is not allowed in court.

Another example: A witness is asked a question about a piece of evidence, and they respond by saying, "I don't know what that is, but it looks suspicious to me." This is also an impermissible comment on the evidence because the witness is making a personal assumption about the evidence, which is not allowed in court.

These examples illustrate how impermissible comments on the evidence can influence the jury's decision and are not allowed in court. It is important to stick to the facts and evidence presented in court and avoid making personal opinions or assumptions.

imperium | impertinent

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.