Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

impermissible comment on the evidence

Read a random definition: immediately harmful behavior

A quick definition of impermissible comment on the evidence:

Impermissible Comment on the Evidence: This means that someone is not allowed to say something about the evidence that is not true or that is not allowed in court. It's like when you're playing a game and someone tries to cheat by saying they have more points than they really do. That's not allowed and it's not fair.

Impersonation: This is when someone pretends to be someone else. It's like when you play dress-up and pretend to be a superhero or a princess. But sometimes people pretend to be someone else to trick other people, and that's not okay. It's like if someone pretended to be a police officer to make you do something you didn't want to do. That's against the law.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Impermissible comment on the evidence refers to making statements or remarks about evidence that are not allowed in court. This includes making personal opinions or assumptions about the evidence, which can influence the jury's decision.

Example: During a trial, a lawyer says to the jury, "In my opinion, the defendant is guilty because the evidence clearly shows that he committed the crime." This is an impermissible comment on the evidence because the lawyer is expressing a personal opinion about the evidence, which is not allowed in court.

Another example: A witness is asked a question about a piece of evidence, and they respond by saying, "I don't know what that is, but it looks suspicious to me." This is also an impermissible comment on the evidence because the witness is making a personal assumption about the evidence, which is not allowed in court.

These examples illustrate how impermissible comments on the evidence can influence the jury's decision and are not allowed in court. It is important to stick to the facts and evidence presented in court and avoid making personal opinions or assumptions.

imperium | impertinent

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
MIAMI A
[] AromaticTroubledDormouse
20:55
How does one know if they are UR1 or UR2?
[] AromaticTroubledDormouse
20:56
CONGRATS MACAQUE!
TY
got a random stanford email and almost had a heart attack
ALSO CONGRATS!
Congrats1!
21:15
Miami A, yall I'm so excited I could cry.
21:15
Feel like I can finally stop holding my breath!! Whew!!!
[] baddestbunny
22:16
every time I get accosted by a strange man who follows me around because my male coworkers were too busy talking to walk me back to my car I get closer to saying we need to bring back traditional gender roles
Dkk
22:32
Nice! @Macaque
Dkk
22:32
@Aromatic, Have to guess.
Dkk
22:33
That sucks @Bunny do you have to go to the hospital?
[] baddestbunny
22:40
I said accosted not assaulted
23:35
guys. my notre dame address just went long is this good or bad
1a2b3c4d26z
23:37
Oooooo me too
23:37
omg is this good or bad
Dkk
23:47
Idk if gender roles are gunna fix that then.
23:49
it looks like most people who applied in october last cycle didn't get a decision until january... does it even mean anything that our addresses went long??
hows ED 2 compared to ED 1?
Dkk
0:10
No idea
windyMagician
0:34
reporting live to say my ndls address also went long
does it mean anything ^
Dkk
2:21
NDLS and Fordham took a very long time last year. It's good info for people to know.
[] baddestbunny
4:29
let’s get after it boys and girls
Dkk
5:21
I gtg to bed soon.
Dkk
5:22
Big day today. Gunna be a crazy one. I will sleep through the first half.
good morning lsd it is 5 am EST
also jazzy my ndls address went long ages ago i sadly do not think it means anything
my stanford address also went long LOL i think at most it's an indicator it's under review
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.