Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

implied reservation

Read a random definition: tax negligence

A quick definition of implied reservation:

An implied reservation is when someone who is selling property retains a right or interest in that property, such as an easement, even though they are giving the property to someone else. This can happen if the seller could have specifically reserved the right, but didn't. It's like keeping a secret right that only the seller knows about. It can also refer to a country's formal declaration that they will only agree to a treaty if certain changes are made. Lastly, it can refer to a piece of land that is set aside for a specific purpose, like for use by indigenous peoples.

A more thorough explanation:

An implied reservation is a legal term that refers to the creation of a new right or interest in real property being granted to another. This can include the establishment of a limiting condition or qualification, such as a nation's formal declaration upon signing or ratifying a treaty. It can also refer to a tract of public land that is set aside for a special purpose, such as use by indigenous peoples.

One example of an implied reservation is an easement that reserves in a landowner the right to cross a portion of sold land, such as a right-of-way over land lying between the seller's home and the only exit. This type of implied easement arises only if the seller could have expressly reserved an easement, but for some reason failed to do so.

Another example of an implied reservation is when a nation signs a treaty but conditions its willingness to become a party to the treaty on the modification or amendment of one or more provisions of the treaty as applied in its relations with other parties to the treaty.

These examples illustrate how an implied reservation can create a new right or interest in real property or establish a limiting condition or qualification in a legal agreement.

implied repeal | implied-reservation-of-water doctrine

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
imagine if it was like Berkley applications
1a2b3c4d26z
11:22
Election status: Complete
1a2b3c4d26z
11:22
For months
triplethread
11:23
erection day
soapy
11:23
Shoutout to Robinhood's election bet not resolving until January
triplethread
11:23
is anyone else like certain that trump will win
ambitiouslizard
11:23
he aint winning
triplethread
11:23
i like being a pessimist
ambitiouslizard
11:24
he lost his re-election, why would he win this one?
1a2b3c4d26z
11:25
I have no idea why people have so much beef w berkeley's app
I've been reading a bit about "herding," which is this idea that pollsters are making the race look tied so they look right no matter who wins.
1a2b3c4d26z
11:26
Like... it's a more involved app but you don't have to do it? They're clearly trying to have some self-selection go on
I 100% agree with the self selection, I also am not even close to touching the medians there. However I think the huge PS plus the video and especially the very specific criteria for the why Berkeley essay is pretty crazy
I'm curious, how bold can one be in those videos? Is it worth making a satirical Jason Statham-action short if the adcoms have no sense of humor?
the more risk you take the higher chance of it backfiring
my instinct would be low humor bc if they have such a complex application I would feel hesitant to use a major part of it as a joke. They clearly take their admissions seriously and a joke video might convey the wrong thing at the wrong time. I think that humor is best put into a PS anecdote where it adds some shine to your personality
safe is always better
All good points
triplethread
11:34
@TheAdoptedOne: amazing
I almost did one for Vanderbilt and my idea was to do a documentary-style vid where I and others talked about me like it was an ESPN 30 for 30.
1a2b3c4d26z
11:36
I was risky in maybe one or two of my essays in that some parts read as slightly humorous, but I really tried to suss out the vibe for each school. I feel like Berk and UMich may be more accommodating of a more "out there" approach than other schools I applied to
1a2b3c4d26z
11:37
but that's literally just going off vibes
it looks like Berk vid is in response to a known prompt. My thinking is it may be a counter to AI by getting people to have to respond to what is essentially an essay prompt but on video
"I think really it’s more the USNWR change that emphasizes employment outcomes in school rankings. Schools want to admit people who have the skills to be more likely to land great jobs even more than before, and being a good interviewer is a very important for that. They want to see you have the soft skills." from a reddit comment
1a2b3c4d26z
11:38
One funny thing when talking to lawyers at work is that they will always say how they wish more law schools had interviews to make sure you can like... talk to people and form sentences
getting lunch no one say anything funny or do anything cool for 15 mins
triplethread
11:43
my dick fell off
Trump dropped out of the race
TheMidwestMonger
11:46
Any chance Notre Dame releases earlier this year?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.