Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

implied revocation of wills

Read a random definition: OG

A quick definition of implied revocation of wills:

Implied revocation of wills happens when someone makes a new will that contradicts their old one, but they don't say they're revoking the old one. This means the old will is cancelled out by the new one. For example, if someone says their first son gets their house, but then later says their second son gets the same house, the second will cancels out the first one. It depends on what the person meant when they wrote the new will whether the old one is completely cancelled or just the parts that don't match the new one.

A more thorough explanation:

The implied revocation of a will, also known as a revocation by inconsistency, happens when a person who has already made a will creates a new one that contradicts the first one. If the new will does not explicitly revoke the first one, the inconsistency between the two wills revokes the first one.

For example, if a person's first will gives their house to their oldest child, but their second will gives the same house to their youngest child, the first will is revoked, and the youngest child will inherit the house. The extent to which the first will is revoked depends on the testator's intentions when writing the second will.

Another example could be if a person's first will leaves their car to their friend, but their second will leaves the same car to their spouse. In this case, the first will is revoked, and the spouse will inherit the car.

Overall, the implied revocation of wills occurs when a new will is created that contradicts the first one, and the first will is not explicitly revoked. The inconsistency between the two wills revokes the first one, and the extent of revocation depends on the testator's intentions.

implied easement by necessity | implied warranty

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.