Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

imputed disqualification

Read a random definition: wrongful termination

A quick definition of imputed disqualification:

Imputed disqualification is when a whole group of lawyers or a law firm is disqualified from representing a client because one of the lawyers has a conflict of interest or bias that prevents them from being impartial. This is also called vicarious disqualification. It means that the actions of one lawyer affect the entire group. Disqualification can also refer to being ineligible for something, like a job or position. Disregard means ignoring or treating something without respect or consideration, while disruptive conduct refers to behavior that causes problems or disturbances. Disseise means wrongfully taking away someone's possession of property.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Imputed disqualification is when a lawyer is disqualified from representing a client due to a conflict of interest, and this disqualification extends to the entire law firm or office they work for. This is also known as vicarious disqualification.

Example: If a lawyer in a law firm has previously represented a client with a conflict of interest, they may be disqualified from representing a new client with a similar conflict. In this case, the entire law firm would also be disqualified from representing the new client.

This example illustrates how imputed disqualification can affect not only the individual lawyer but also their colleagues in the same law firm or office. It is important to avoid conflicts of interest to prevent imputed disqualification and maintain ethical standards in the legal profession.

imputation | imputed income

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
18:46
do u have a dream school?
18:46
well i saw one is at fordham and one is at upenn and ik fordham isnt t14 but its better than temple and villanova
18:47
dream is duke
18:47
ooh interesting choice why Duke?
18:48
i got into fordham and so did the dumbass I was dating for like two months it’s not that hard
18:48
by which I mean if they let him in I don’t trust their standards
18:49
my dad went to duke law so i have been a fan forever
18:49
Duke is fun. I took a trip there when I was 19 or so. Really good time when I was a young rapscallion.
18:49
and ik i just dont think i gave myself enough time for a guaranteed 170+ performance
18:49
I didnt see if anyone answered my UGA question. Did anyone answer it?
18:53
@Dkkm11: are you not still a young rapscallion?
19:00
Nah, I am gray-bearded wizard.
19:02
Hmmm. I guess that’s okay.
19:03
Honestly, idk what I would call myself these days. Will probably not know until I can reflect on this part of my life which will be idk, in like 5 years when I am 32.
19:06
Does your life come in 5 year epochs typically?
19:06
Someone told me a while ago that I was probably molested as a kid because I don’t really have any clear memories of my childhood. But I don’t think I was.
1a2b3c4d26z
19:10
Inside thoughts!
19:10
this is where I post my inside thoughts
19:11
Nah, the fucked up thing about therapists is they try and make you think your parents are your enemy 99% of the time and really they should be telling you that your parents have almost no effect on the rest of your life. If they can get you to keep focusing on your parents they can keep making money.
19:12
Yeah, my life really does flow in about 5 years periods.
19:12
My crypto also flows in 5 day epochs too.
19:16
what do you do with your days as an unemployed crypto guy? do you play an instrument or something
19:47
please lawd
19:47
forgive me
19:47
its time to go back to tha old me
19:50
this is what i feel like when i get one single drill question right
19:50
when u get one wrong ;(
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.