Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

indigent defendant

Read a random definition: Obiter dictum

A quick definition of indigent defendant:

Indigent defendant: A person who is too poor to pay for a lawyer and is eligible to receive help from a court-appointed attorney and a waiver of court costs when they are accused of a crime. This is also known as being "in forma pauperis." It is different from being a pauper, which means being extremely poor in general.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: An indigent defendant is a person who is too poor to afford a lawyer and, upon being charged with a crime, becomes eligible to receive assistance from a court-appointed attorney and a waiver of court costs. This means that the government will provide a lawyer for the defendant if they cannot afford one themselves.

Example: John is a homeless man who has been accused of stealing food from a grocery store. He cannot afford to hire a lawyer to defend himself in court. As an indigent defendant, he is eligible to receive a court-appointed attorney and a waiver of court costs.

Explanation: This example illustrates how an indigent defendant is someone who cannot afford a lawyer and needs assistance from the government to receive legal representation. John is too poor to hire a lawyer, so he is eligible for a court-appointed attorney and a waiver of court costs. This ensures that even those who cannot afford legal representation can still receive a fair trial.

indigency | indignity

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Can y'all help me understand something lol. What does it mean for an app to "go complete"? Is that when the school has reviewed it and made a decision?
13:35
Na, it's when they have all the required information
Gotcha. So what would be the difference between received and completed?
Does complete entail like the app + LORs?
13:35
correct
That makes sense. Thank you!
13:36
complete basically means they've acknowledged receipt and it's ready to go under review whenever they start the deliberative process
Quillinit
13:40
I still haven't had Chicago or Cornell go complete, but I think that's just how they be
13:41
when did you submit
CaringEquableGuppy
13:42
How do you know when an application is complete? Is it on LSAC or the school's portal?
13:43
it'll be on the school-specific portal
Quillinit
13:44
when they opened
Quillinit
13:45
they both say something along the lines of "received and waiting to be processed"
13:48
anyone have good resources for revising a personal statement for reuse after applying with it last cycle?
13:49
Any guesses when Cornell and Penn CRS fee waivers will go out?
13:51
@Quillinit: from my recollection, chicago and cornell collapse complete/UR1 into a single step, so they may simply not be ready to begin reviewing applications
13:52
i think it's fair to assume, barring a handful of schools like UVA, most schools won't begin reviewing applications in earnest until the beginning of next month at the earliest, so it wouldn't be surprising to hear that applications are just sitting in the queue
13:54
@oakenrays: I was just gonna write a new one personally but I think you want to make it recognizably different from your previous PS
13:56
@baddestbunny: definitely agree that some revision and additional information is warranted but, my why law is the same... I guess just tell the same story in a different way
14:03
ugh fineeee I'll write a new stupid essay
14:07
yeah I told my last essay about a formative experience and am trying to update it now to be about what I’ve learned since that experience
recently wrapped up interview
i re-wrote my PS this cycle when I reapplied
fire drill at work
so lit
Quillinit
15:10
oh fun @info-man, Chicago just changed to complete today, so we'll see
boglue
15:23
do you have to have lawhub advantage for the lsd status checker to work
lawhub kind of a freaky ass name now that i think about it
16:22
The reason why today’s Image-Fiction isn’t the rescue from a passive, addictive TV-psychology that it tries so hard to be is that most Image-Fiction writers render their material with the same tone of irony and self-consciousness that their ancestors, the literary insurgents of Beat and postmodernism, used so effectively to rebel against their own world and context. And the reason why this irreverent postmodern approach fails to help the new Imagists transfigure TV is simply that TV has beaten the new Imagists to the punch.
Quillinit
16:26
idk lsd status checker button hasn't worked for me this whole cycle so far
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.