Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

inessential mistake

Read a random definition: London commodity option

A quick definition of inessential mistake:

An inessential mistake is a type of mistake in a contract that does not affect the validity of the agreement. It is a mistake about something external to the agreement, rather than a mistake about the nature of the agreement itself. For example, if two people agree to sell a car, but one of them mistakenly believes the car has a sunroof, this is an inessential mistake because it does not change the fact that they agreed to sell the car. Inessential mistakes are different from essential mistakes, which are serious enough to mean that there was no real agreement between the parties.

A more thorough explanation:

An inessential mistake is a type of mistake in a contract that does not affect the validity of the agreement. It is a mistake that relates to some external circumstance and not the nature of the contents of the agreement. For example, if two parties agree to sell a car, but one party mistakenly believes the car is red when it is actually blue, this is an inessential mistake because it does not affect the validity of the agreement.

On the other hand, an essential mistake is a mistake serious enough that no real consent could have existed, so that there was no real agreement. For example, if two parties agree to sell a car, but one party mistakenly believes they are selling a boat, this is an essential mistake because it affects the validity of the agreement.

It is important to distinguish between essential and inessential mistakes because only essential mistakes can make a contract voidable. Inessential mistakes do not affect the validity of the agreement and therefore cannot be used as a basis for voiding the contract.

in essentialibus | in est de jure

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.