Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

infangthief

Read a random definition: live storage

A quick definition of infangthief:

Term: INFANGTHIEF

Definition: Infangthief is an old English word that means a lord of a manor had the power to catch and punish a thief who stole something from their land. This was a special privilege that allowed the lord to deal with the thief quickly and without going to court. It only applied to thieves caught with stolen goods on the lord's land. Outfangthief was a similar privilege that allowed the lord to pursue and capture a thief who had stolen something from their land and then fled.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Infangthief (in-fang-theef) is a historical term that refers to the privilege held by a lord of a manor to try and deal summarily with a thief captured on the lord's land, especially a thief captured with plunder. It comes from the Old English words "in" meaning "in," "fangen" meaning "taken," and "theof" meaning "thief." Infangthief is also spelled infangthef and is related to the term outfangthief.

During medieval times, lords of manors had the power of infangthief, which meant they could capture and punish thieves who stole from their land. For example, if a thief was caught stealing a sheep from a lord's field, the lord could hold a trial and punish the thief without involving the local authorities.

Another example of infangthief in action is when a lord's bailiff caught a thief stealing from a market stall on the lord's land. The bailiff could take the thief to the lord's court and punish them according to the lord's laws.

These examples illustrate how infangthief was a powerful tool for lords to maintain order and protect their property. It allowed them to deal with thieves quickly and efficiently without relying on outside authorities.

infamous | infans

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.