Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

ingross

Read a random definition: express authority

A quick definition of ingross:

Term: INGROSS

Definition: Ingross means to write a legal document, like a deed, in big letters. It used to be a popular way of writing in the past. It can also mean to make a copy of a legal document before it is signed or to buy a lot of something to control the price. Ingross can also mean to fully occupy or absorb something.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Ingross is an old spelling of the word engross, which means:

  1. To handwrite a document, especially a deed, in a style characterized by large letters. This method of writing was derived from ancient court hand and was also used in transcribing wills well into the 19th century.
  2. To prepare a copy of a legal document, such as a deed, for execution.
  3. To prepare a copy of a bill or mandate before a final legislative vote.
  4. To buy large quantities of a stock or commodity in an effort to corner the market and control the price.
  5. To absorb or fully occupy.

Example: John engrossed the deed to his new house in large letters to make it look more official.

Explanation: In this example, John is handwriting the deed to his new house in a style characterized by large letters, which is one of the meanings of engross.

Example: The lawyer engrossed a copy of the will for the executor to sign.

Explanation: In this example, the lawyer is preparing a copy of the will for execution, which is another meaning of engross.

Example: The senator asked for a copy of the bill to be engrossed before the final vote.

Explanation: In this example, the senator is requesting a copy of the bill to be prepared before the final legislative vote, which is another meaning of engross.

in gross | ingrossator

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.