Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

initial margin requirement

Read a random definition: side reports

A quick definition of initial margin requirement:

Initial Margin Requirement: When someone wants to buy a stock using borrowed money (called margin), they have to give some of their own money as a deposit. This deposit is called the initial margin requirement. It's a percentage of the total amount they want to borrow and is set by the government to prevent people from borrowing too much and causing problems in the stock market.

Maintenance Margin Requirement: After someone has bought a stock on margin, they have to keep a certain amount of their own money in the account to avoid losing the stock. This is called the maintenance margin requirement and is also set by the government. It's a percentage of the total value of the account and helps ensure that people don't lose more money than they can afford to.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: The initial margin requirement is the percentage of the purchase price that a buyer must deposit with a broker to buy a security on margin. This percentage is set and adjusted by the Federal Reserve Board.

Example: If a buyer wants to purchase $10,000 worth of stock on margin and the initial margin requirement is 50%, they would need to deposit $5,000 with their broker.

This requirement is in place to prevent excessive speculation and price volatility in the stock market. By requiring buyers to put down a certain percentage of the purchase price, it ensures that they have some skin in the game and are less likely to make risky investments that could lead to financial instability.

initialia testimonii | initial protest

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.