Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Insurance - State statutes

Read a random definition: appello

A quick definition of Insurance - State statutes:

Each state in the United States has its own set of laws and regulations regarding insurance. These laws are called state statutes. They outline the rules that insurance companies and policyholders must follow. For example, they may require insurance companies to provide certain types of coverage or prohibit them from engaging in certain practices. It's important to be aware of your state's insurance statutes if you're buying insurance or filing a claim. You can find your state's statutes by searching for the title or chapter number on the state's official website.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: State statutes refer to the laws and regulations that govern the insurance industry in each state. These statutes outline the requirements for insurance companies, agents, and policyholders, and provide guidelines for how insurance policies should be written, sold, and administered.

For example, in California, the state statutes (Title 10) outline the requirements for insurance companies to obtain a license to operate in the state, the types of insurance policies that can be sold, and the minimum coverage amounts for certain types of insurance, such as auto insurance.

Similarly, in New York, the state statutes (Insurance) provide guidelines for how insurance policies should be written, including the required disclosures and provisions that must be included in the policy.

These examples illustrate how state statutes provide a framework for the insurance industry to operate within each state, ensuring that insurance companies and agents are held to certain standards and that policyholders are protected.

insurance | insurance fraud

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.