Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

intentional tort

Read a random definition: Bruton error

A quick definition of intentional tort:

An intentional tort is when someone does something on purpose that hurts someone else. There are different types of intentional torts, like hitting someone (battery), scaring someone (assault), or keeping someone somewhere they don't want to be (false imprisonment). Even if the person didn't mean to hurt someone, if they did something on purpose that caused harm, they can still be held responsible for an intentional tort. Sometimes, the law allows for extra punishment, called punitive damages, if the person's behavior was really bad.

A more thorough explanation:

An intentional tort is a type of legal claim that arises when someone intentionally harms another person or their property. This means that the person who caused the harm did so on purpose, rather than by accident. There are several different types of intentional torts, including:

For example, if someone intentionally hits another person, that could be considered battery. Or if someone intentionally locks another person in a room, that could be considered false imprisonment.

It's important to note that intentional torts require intent. This means that the person who caused the harm must have intended to do so. For example, if someone accidentally bumps into another person and causes them to fall, that would not be considered an intentional tort.

Legal codes and statutes provide causes of action for intentional torts, and they may also provide for punitive damages in cases where the defendant's conduct was particularly egregious. For example, California's Civil Code Section 3294 provides for punitive damages in certain cases of intentional torts.

One example of an intentional tort is the case of Garratt v. Dailey. In this case, a young boy intentionally pulled a chair out from under an elderly woman, causing her to fall and sustain injuries. The court held that the boy was liable for the intentional tort of battery, even though he did not intend to harm her. This case illustrates how intent is a key element in intentional torts.

intentional interference with contractual relations | inter alia

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
well with lolita maybe some versions don't have it but at least in the original russian publication the foreword of the book is that this is a court transcript of his confession
so yeah it does tell you how to feel because it shows every description of her is completely untrue and warped
but nabokov published much weirder shit than lolita as wild as that is lol
babycat
15:14
I love Pale Fire
what's the name of the one about siblings
babycat
15:15
Ada or Ardor I think
Dkk
15:16
I think it can be ambiguous, but it should be something the viewer should be able to figure out. If not then what is the point. In terms of audience intelligence, I don't think the highest level of movie watchers would care for this movie. I think the opposite. The movie does not appeal to the highest level of movie watchers. It also doesn't appeal to like the lowest level either. It just tells a simple story that comes off as propoganda.
yeah you're right thank you
i agree dkk if we are talking about lolita
babycat
15:16
we’re talking about the movie perfect days by wim wenders
unfortunately it very much distills the actual novel which yeah i mean that is typical of any film ever so it's not profound of me to say that
LSDFan
15:17
yo dkk, send the dick again
ohh okay i have no idea what that is
15:17
Does the status date disappearing on GW mean something?
Dkk
15:17
Ahh nah was talking about the Japanese movie. And I would say how people are comfortable with ambiguity can be completely different. I feel as if when I see ambiguity I just say whatever, but when others see it they obsess over it to the point they gain anxiety and it is not healthy. Engaging with ambiguity is not something that should be encouraged.
15:17
@FormerLN: may mean you're due for a decision in their next wave
15:18
they had a wave yesterday so probably won't hear back for another week or so
15:18
average lsd chat when theres no wave
Dkk
15:19
@LSDFan: here you go ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣠⣶⣿⣿⣿⣷⣤⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣾⡿⠋⠀⠿⠇⠉⠻⣿⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢠⣿⠏⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠙⣿⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⢠⣿⡏⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠸⣿⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⡄⠀⠀⠀⢀⣤⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡿⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠻⣿⣶⣶⣾⡿⠟⢿⣷⣶⣶⣿⡟⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡏⠉⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠉⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⠀⣸⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⢀⣴⣿⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⢀⣠⣴⣿⣷⣿⠟⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣧⣄⡀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⢀⣴⡿⠛⠉⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠉⠙⢿⣷⣄⠀ ⢠⣿⠏⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠙⣿⣆ ⣿⡟⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢹⣿ ⣿⣇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⡆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿ ⢹⣿⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢿⣷⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣾⡿ ⠀⠻⣿⣦⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⣿⣷⣄⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣤⣾⡟⠁ ⠀⠀⠈⠛⠿⣿⣷⣶⣾⡿⠿⠛⠻⢿⣿⣶⣾⣿⠿⠛⠉⠀⠀
misoissocute
15:19
bruh im at worl
misoissocute
15:19
work
15:19
I click back onto this tab at work and that's what i see
Dkk
15:20
It was asked for. I must oblige.
Dkk
15:20
I am honor bound.
babycat
15:20
"Engaging with ambiguity is not something that should be encouraged" is a crazy ass thing for a future lawyer to say. Bro that's your job
JumpySubsequentDolphin
15:21
one of the tips is messed up
Dkk
15:21
Nah my job is to write good clean consise law that removes ambiguity. If I run into a case where things are too ambiguous for me, it is because I have not developed a strong enough theory to work within.
concorde
15:22
what the hell is cornell "on reserve"
concorde
15:22
is that waitlist?
Dkk
15:23
These movies like wallow in ambiguity and embrace it as a desired element of the artistry but to me that it something that should be cut or if anything, the facts should be there to make a decision.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.