Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

involuntary civil commitment

Read a random definition: Kellogg–Briand Pact

A quick definition of involuntary civil commitment:

Involuntary civil commitment is when someone is taken to a mental health unit even if they don't want to go. This can happen if the person has a mental illness, developmental disability, or addiction to drugs or alcohol. The main reason for this is if the person is a danger to themselves or others. There is a process that includes a hearing, a lawyer, and regular checks to make sure the person is being treated well.

A more thorough explanation:

Involuntary civil commitment is when someone is admitted to a mental health unit without their consent. This can happen for three reasons: mental illness, developmental disability, or substance addiction.

If someone is mentally ill, they may be committed if they are a danger to themselves or others. In most states, not being able to take care of oneself is considered dangerous to oneself.

When someone is involuntarily committed, they have the right to a hearing, a lawyer, and periodic reviews. Most states also have standards for the quality of treatment and the hospital environment.

For example, if someone is experiencing severe depression and is at risk of harming themselves, they may be involuntarily committed to a mental health unit for their own safety. Another example is if someone has a severe addiction to drugs and is unable to stop using, they may be committed to a substance abuse treatment facility.

These examples illustrate how involuntary civil commitment is used to protect individuals who may be a danger to themselves or others due to their mental illness, developmental disability, or substance addiction.

involuntary act | involuntary intoxication

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.