Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

IRV

Read a random definition: lawbreaker

A quick definition of IRV:

IRV stands for instant-runoff voting, which is a way of voting where people rank their choices instead of just picking one. It's like having a second round of voting without actually having to vote again. The person with the most votes wins, but if nobody gets enough votes, the person with the least votes is eliminated and their votes go to the next choice on the ballots. This keeps happening until someone has enough votes to win. It's a fair way of voting that helps make sure the winner has the most support from voters.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: IRV stands for instant-runoff voting, which is a system of preferential voting that mimics a runoff election by using each voter's ranked preferences instead of a second round of voting. This means that instead of just choosing one candidate, voters rank their choices in order of preference. If no candidate gets a majority of first-choice votes, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated, and their votes are redistributed to the remaining candidates based on the voters' second choices. This process continues until one candidate has a majority of votes.

Example: In an election with three candidates, Alice, Bob, and Charlie, voters rank their choices as follows: 40% choose Alice as their first choice, 35% choose Bob, and 25% choose Charlie. Since no candidate has a majority of first-choice votes, Charlie is eliminated, and his votes are redistributed to the remaining candidates based on the voters' second choices. Let's say that 60% of Charlie's voters chose Bob as their second choice, and 40% chose Alice. After the redistribution, Bob has 55% of the votes, and Alice has 45%. Therefore, Bob wins the election.

Explanation: IRV allows voters to express their preferences more fully than traditional voting systems, and it ensures that the winner has majority support. It also eliminates the need for a separate runoff election, which can save time and money. However, it can be more complicated to count the votes and explain the process to voters.

irrotulatio | ISCGS

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
letsseehowitgoesnow
16:40
if i get into kent ill probs visit Chicago next year. same with boston
[] baddestbunny
16:40
men u should be jumping at this I have several brilliant and beautiful single friends who will be going to Chicago with me
16:40
I will be in Vegas
[] baddestbunny
16:41
and my bday is in December too
letsseehowitgoesnow
16:41
any of them into recently single, mid height/looks, mexican skater dudes?
[] baddestbunny
16:41
dude I can ask
[] baddestbunny
16:41
it’s never come up
[] baddestbunny
16:41
I don’t think they have mid Mexican dudes in France
letsseehowitgoesnow
16:41
im shocked
letsseehowitgoesnow
16:42
i never stood a chance
letsseehowitgoesnow
16:43
is chicago better than NYC?
[] baddestbunny
16:44
I’ve only been there once and I’ve been to nyc hundreds of times so I can’t make a fair comparison lol
16:45
I need to break this dry spell
16:45
Gonna go swimming
KeenHeartbreakingRattlesnake
17:03
if I go ur2 and then I get another status update from lsac like a couple hours after the first and it shows that my substatus is now under review, is that ur3
17:58
What is ur2 / ur3
17:58
Under review
18:08
Bros trying to find guys on lsd its that bad bunny?
Will I ever go UR
Or complete!
18:23
What is UR
18:24
Why does GTown think they're worth an $85 application fee
get a waiver
U blowin my shit hoe u hawk tuahing me
19:00
@ChowieBean: thanks again for that podcast episode last night. I could answer those questions but I remember not being able to a year ago.
19:01
I got two rc sections for whoever asked
19:26
You're welcome Dkkm, how'd it go for you?
When people get faster turn around times on applications then I do I feel like that means I got sidelined or something
19:59
It went well. Everything seemed to have an obvious answer and every question seemed to have 4 obvious not the answers. I think it went well but I always fear I went too fast. I finished each section with about a minute to spare. I got an LR question that seemed like the virus logic game at the end of one of my LR sections.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.