LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

joint authors

Read a random definition: tithe of agistment

A quick definition of joint authors:

Joint authors are two or more people who work together to create something that can be protected by copyright. They each contribute to the work and agree to combine their efforts into one final product. Each author can use the work as they wish, but they must share any profits with the other authors based on their contribution.

A more thorough explanation:

Joint authors are two or more people who work together to create a piece of work that can be copyrighted. Each author contributes to the work and intends for their contribution to be combined with the others to create a single work. They can each use the work as they wish, but they must share the profits with the other authors.

Two musicians collaborate on a song. One writes the lyrics and the other composes the music. They intend for their contributions to be merged into a single work, and they both have the right to use the song as they wish. If the song makes money, they must share the profits.

Two authors write a book together. One writes the first half of the book, and the other writes the second half. They intend for their contributions to be merged into a single work, and they both have the right to use the book as they wish. If the book makes money, they must share the profits.

These examples illustrate joint authors because in both cases, two or more people work together to create a single work that they can each use as they wish. They must share the profits because they are joint authors and each contributed to the work.

joint annuity | joint ballot

General

General chat about the legal profession.

General >T14 Off Topic

👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎

ClockworkBlue

11:21

Imagine if election night was run by an adcom? Like, "yep, we could get the results Friday, or June 2025."

TheAdoptedOne

11:21

imagine if it was like Berkley applications

1a2b3c4d26z

11:22

Election status: Complete

1a2b3c4d26z

11:22

For months

triplethread

11:23

erection day

TheAdoptedOne

11:23

https://www.reddit.com/r/lawschooladmissions/comments/1gixhib/berkeleys_application_is_snobby_af/

soapy

11:23

Shoutout to Robinhood's election bet not resolving until January

triplethread

11:23

is anyone else like certain that trump will win

ambitiouslizard

11:23

he aint winning

triplethread

11:23

i like being a pessimist

ambitiouslizard

11:24

he lost his re-election, why would he win this one?

1a2b3c4d26z

11:25

I have no idea why people have so much beef w berkeley's app

ClockworkBlue

11:25

I've been reading a bit about "herding," which is this idea that pollsters are making the race look tied so they look right no matter who wins.

1a2b3c4d26z

11:26

Like... it's a more involved app but you don't have to do it? They're clearly trying to have some self-selection go on

TheAdoptedOne

11:28

I 100% agree with the self selection, I also am not even close to touching the medians there. However I think the huge PS plus the video and especially the very specific criteria for the why Berkeley essay is pretty crazy

ClockworkBlue

11:31

I'm curious, how bold can one be in those videos? Is it worth making a satirical Jason Statham-action short if the adcoms have no sense of humor?

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

11:33

the more risk you take the higher chance of it backfiring

TheAdoptedOne

11:33

my instinct would be low humor bc if they have such a complex application I would feel hesitant to use a major part of it as a joke. They clearly take their admissions seriously and a joke video might convey the wrong thing at the wrong time. I think that humor is best put into a PS anecdote where it adds some shine to your personality

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

11:33

safe is always better

ClockworkBlue

11:34

All good points

triplethread

11:34

@TheAdoptedOne: amazing

ClockworkBlue

11:35

I almost did one for Vanderbilt and my idea was to do a documentary-style vid where I and others talked about me like it was an ESPN 30 for 30.

1a2b3c4d26z

11:36

I was risky in maybe one or two of my essays in that some parts read as slightly humorous, but I really tried to suss out the vibe for each school. I feel like Berk and UMich may be more accommodating of a more "out there" approach than other schools I applied to

1a2b3c4d26z

11:37

but that's literally just going off vibes

TheAdoptedOne

11:37

it looks like Berk vid is in response to a known prompt. My thinking is it may be a counter to AI by getting people to have to respond to what is essentially an essay prompt but on video

TheAdoptedOne

11:38

"I think really it’s more the USNWR change that emphasizes employment outcomes in school rankings. Schools want to admit people who have the skills to be more likely to land great jobs even more than before, and being a good interviewer is a very important for that. They want to see you have the soft skills." from a reddit comment

1a2b3c4d26z

11:38

One funny thing when talking to lawyers at work is that they will always say how they wish more law schools had interviews to make sure you can like... talk to people and form sentences

TheAdoptedOne

11:41

getting lunch no one say anything funny or do anything cool for 15 mins

triplethread

11:43

my dick fell off

ClockworkBlue

11:43

Trump dropped out of the race

LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.