Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV)

Read a random definition: Court of Appeals in Cases of Capture

A quick definition of judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV):

A judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) is a decision made by a judge after a jury has given their verdict in a trial. If the judge thinks that the jury's decision was not based on the evidence presented or if they made a mistake in applying the law, the judge can set aside the jury's verdict and make their own decision. This is similar to a directed verdict, but it happens after the jury has given their decision. A JNOV can be requested by the losing party or granted by the judge on their own. It can be given to either the plaintiff or defendant in a civil case. Sometimes, a JNOV is requested along with a motion for a new trial. The judge's decision can be reviewed on appeal.

A more thorough explanation:

A Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict (JNOV) is a decision made by a judge after a jury has given their verdict in a trial. The judge sets aside the jury's decision and enters a new judgment in favor of the losing party without a new trial. This is similar to a directed verdict, but it happens after the jury has given their verdict.

A judge will issue a JNOV if they believe that the jury's verdict was unreasonable based on the evidence presented at trial, or if the jury made a mistake in applying the law. A JNOV can be granted in response to a motion by the losing party or by the judge's own decision in some jurisdictions.

For example, in a personal injury case, the jury may have found the defendant not liable for the plaintiff's injuries. However, the judge may issue a JNOV if they believe that the evidence presented clearly shows that the defendant was responsible for the injuries.

It's important to note that some jurisdictions require a party to file a motion for a directed verdict earlier in the trial to preserve their right to move for a JNOV later on. A motion for a JNOV is often filed together with a motion for a new trial by the losing party in response to the jury's verdict.

A judge's decision to grant or deny a motion for JNOV can be reviewed on appeal. In federal cases, JNOV has been replaced by Judgment as a Matter of Law (JMOL) under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

judgment notwithstanding the verdict | judgment proof

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
just tell them you're applying to monsters university
13:34
as far as i know, that information is simply for data collection purposes
^
13:34
i don't think it has a detrimental effect on your chances of admission
13:34
but also you don't need to tell them anything so lol
Can y'all help me understand something lol. What does it mean for an app to "go complete"? Is that when the school has reviewed it and made a decision?
13:35
Na, it's when they have all the required information
Gotcha. So what would be the difference between received and completed?
Does complete entail like the app + LORs?
13:35
correct
That makes sense. Thank you!
13:36
complete basically means they've acknowledged receipt and it's ready to go under review whenever they start the deliberative process
Quillinit
13:40
I still haven't had Chicago or Cornell go complete, but I think that's just how they be
13:41
when did you submit
CaringEquableGuppy
13:42
How do you know when an application is complete? Is it on LSAC or the school's portal?
13:43
it'll be on the school-specific portal
Quillinit
13:44
when they opened
Quillinit
13:45
they both say something along the lines of "received and waiting to be processed"
13:48
anyone have good resources for revising a personal statement for reuse after applying with it last cycle?
13:49
Any guesses when Cornell and Penn CRS fee waivers will go out?
13:51
@Quillinit: from my recollection, chicago and cornell collapse complete/UR1 into a single step, so they may simply not be ready to begin reviewing applications
13:52
i think it's fair to assume, barring a handful of schools like UVA, most schools won't begin reviewing applications in earnest until the beginning of next month at the earliest, so it wouldn't be surprising to hear that applications are just sitting in the queue
13:54
@oakenrays: I was just gonna write a new one personally but I think you want to make it recognizably different from your previous PS
13:56
@baddestbunny: definitely agree that some revision and additional information is warranted but, my why law is the same... I guess just tell the same story in a different way
14:03
ugh fineeee I'll write a new stupid essay
14:07
yeah I told my last essay about a formative experience and am trying to update it now to be about what I’ve learned since that experience
recently wrapped up interview
i re-wrote my PS this cycle when I reapplied
fire drill at work
so lit
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.