Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

judicial bypass

Read a random definition: turpitude

A quick definition of judicial bypass:

Term: Judicial Bypass

Definition: Judicial bypass is a process that allows a person to get permission from a court for an action that would normally require someone else's approval. For example, if a law requires a minor to tell their parent before getting an abortion, but the minor is qualified to make the decision on their own, they can ask a court for permission to get the abortion without telling their parent.

A more thorough explanation:

Judicial Bypass

Judicial bypass is a legal process that allows a person to obtain a court's approval for an action that would normally require the approval of someone else. For example, in some states, minors are required to notify their parents before obtaining an abortion. However, a minor who is qualified can obtain a court order that permits the abortion without parental notice.

One example of judicial bypass is when a minor wants to get an abortion but is unable to obtain parental consent. In this case, the minor can go to court and ask for permission to have the abortion without notifying their parents.

Another example is when a person wants to change their name but needs the approval of their parents or guardians. If the parents or guardians do not approve, the person can go to court and ask for permission to change their name without their approval.

Judicial bypass is a legal process that allows a person to obtain a court's approval for an action that would normally require the approval of someone else. The examples illustrate how a minor can obtain an abortion without parental notice and how a person can change their name without the approval of their parents or guardians. These examples show how judicial bypass can be used to protect a person's rights and allow them to make important decisions about their own lives.

judicial branch | judicial-bypass provision

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.