Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

jus tertii

Read a random definition: Inn of Court

A quick definition of jus tertii:

Term: JUS TERTII

Definition: Jus tertii means the right of a third party. It is a legal term that refers to the idea that someone who is not directly involved in a case may have a right to something that is being disputed. For example, if two people are fighting over a piece of land, a third person who has a legal claim to the land may have the right to intervene in the case. Jus tertii is also used to describe the idea that courts should only make decisions about things that are directly relevant to the case at hand, and not get involved in issues that are not directly related.

A more thorough explanation:

Jus tertii (pronounced jəs tər-shē-ī) is a Latin term that refers to the right of a third party.

In a legal case of trespass, the defendant cannot use the jus tertii defense to claim that a third party has the right to possess the property in question. This is because the plaintiff has the fact of possession on their side.

In constitutional law, the doctrine of jus tertii means that courts do not make decisions on issues that are not directly relevant to the case at hand. For instance, if a court is deciding a case about the constitutionality of a law, they will not make a ruling on a separate issue that is not directly related to the case.

These examples illustrate how jus tertii is used in different legal contexts to refer to the rights of third parties and the limitations on court decisions.

just deserts | justice-broker

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
YRDSL
17:08
im a 1 issue voter - if i want someone to be elected i vote for them
woof
texaslawhopefully
17:08
I've seen some that could be as high as 7k though
17:08
@jackfrost11770: ya prolly don't buy any lotto tickets tonite
get on that trump coin before the rug pull lol
Dkk
17:09
@BigStrongBug: I don't consider myself a one issue voter but if I had to pick one it would be gender relations.
i am a one issue voter for the economy, which is why i voted harris
texaslawhopefully
17:10
Here's a fairly well respected estimate fruitybat: The proposed tariffs could cost consumers an additional $2,500 to $7,600 a year per household, according to estimates, said Jonathan Gold, vice president of supply chain and customs policy for the National Retail Federation.
i am a voter so i voted
17:11
Lol what does gender relations mean
17:11
Like are you anti gay marriage?
texaslawhopefully
17:11
@Dkk: So you care about gender relations over the Constitution, institutional stability, the economy, political norms, etc.?
blue collar trump voters are gonna blame anything but him anyway when the price of their household consumption goes through the roof. I wonder how they'll spin that narrative.
17:11
Or are you an all inclusive hater and include trans folks too
texaslawhopefully
17:12
Even if you have conservative social values you still shouldn't like Trump lol, but that's a whole diff convo
I love when people prefer putting not talking about gender in schools at the top of the agenda instead of dealing with school shootings
this is going to blow your mind but once you realize women and men are more similar than different you will drown in pussy or dick
17:12
@HopefullyInLawSchool: $45k @ KS is really good. $145k is to attend it is not a bad deal
facts knowledgeable
Also love how he put an EO to leave the Paris climate agreement in the midst of the LA wildfires and places who haven’t gotten snow in 15 years now getting storms
@llama: it would only be 17,000 ish per year
17:15
yeah and i think after 1L u get in state? not certain
I dont think so based on my very brief research
17:16
hmm I know some school offer that in their offer (I also believe KS does not negotiate) but I wonder which schools would reconsider with a condition of in state after 1L yr?
Dkk
17:17
@texaslawhopefully: Not necessarily but I believe what Aristotle used to say. He used to say you could not have a functioning political system if you can not get gender relations right. Or essentially that.
KS does negotiate! I got an email saying theyre doing it for the first time this year
its rather limited but its not nothing
17:18
@HopefullyInLawSchool: noted, thanks for the intel. I know we joke around but all things conidered, KS is goated
Dkk
17:18
@BigStrongBug: Nah aristotle only applies gender as a role which I think either sex could fulfill. My issue with Trump's EO to limit things to only sex but I am fine with him doing it for now.
Yeah and Aristotle old as hell boy he would’ve died of hysteria after learning what the internet and tiktok is
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.