Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

just-war doctrine

Read a random definition: defense of others

A quick definition of just-war doctrine:

The just-war doctrine is a principle that says a war should only happen if there is a good reason for it, and it should be fought with restraint. This means using the least amount of force possible and only when necessary. What is considered a good reason depends on the norms of the time and place. In the past, people have used this doctrine to justify wars for self-defense, to punish wrongs, and over religious differences. However, with the adoption of the U.N. Charter, the idea of a just war has lost its legal significance, and the Charter only allows the use of force in self-defense.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Just-war doctrine is a principle in international law that states a war should have a morally and legally sufficient cause and must be conducted with restraint. The reason for the war should be good enough, and the war should only use the least amount of force necessary.

For example, a war waged in self-defense or to punish wrongs can be considered justifiable. However, the use of force should be limited to what is necessary to achieve the goal.

Example: The United States' involvement in World War II is often cited as an example of a just war. The country entered the war after Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, which was seen as a morally and legally sufficient cause. The war was conducted with restraint, and the US only used the amount of force necessary to defeat the Axis powers.

The just-war doctrine has been invoked to justify wars over religious differences, to avenge injuries, and punish wrongs. However, what is considered morally or legally sufficient depends on the norms of a time and place.

just war | jus urbanorum praediorum

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
lilypadfrog
14:08
damn you get vicious with it. just pinch yourself or something
lilypadfrog
14:09
don’t break your finger
14:13
its a bum-ass law school but LSD really needs to update UCLawSF's name
14:13
whose manager can I call about that
lilypadfrog
14:14
I think the people in charge don’t come on here anymore but you can email them if you really care like that
14:14
yeah true that. Although I prefer Hastings just because it is easy to differentiate from U of SF
renard99
14:14
There's a lot on this site that doesn't work and for maybe $5k I'd be more than willing to fix it
14:14
send bid proposal Renard
renard99
14:14
But as Lilypad said it's probably just maintained atp, no major updates
14:15
fwiw all the UCLSF students I know still basically say hastings. even the huge crest in the foyer still says hastings
renard99
14:15
@llama: Man I'd be more than happy to
14:15
LSD is in decay age of social network
renard99
14:15
^LMAO yeah
renard99
14:15
Basically accepted atp that I'm gonna have to R&R so might as well take up some jobs while I'm at it
14:15
sad. imagine being here in 2005/2010 when it was 100 operational. woe is me
@llama: back when 160s meant t14
14:16
born too late to experience full LSD born too soon to explore the galaxy
14:16
^ gets it
lilypadfrog
14:16
https://www.lsd.law/users/creep/cryptanon this is one of the guys who made the website
14:16
@lilypadfrog: wow more recent than i would have wagered
14:17
how is it so that I creep a rando and their app year is 2005-2005?
14:17
2005-2006* for example
renard99
14:18
^ find that rando in your circle and ask them where they've stored all their cycle letters
ReminiscentZestyFish
14:18
Vandy??
renard99
14:18
Possibly in a dark corner of the attic in a box
VANDY
soyalmondoatmilk
14:18
vandy A let's gooooo
all the Vandy
ReminiscentZestyFish
14:18
Aint no way
jackfrost11770
14:19
Wow that's awesome nothing from vandy
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.