Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

just-war doctrine

Read a random definition: disorderly conduct

A quick definition of just-war doctrine:

The just-war doctrine is a principle that says a war should only happen if there is a good reason for it, and it should be fought with restraint. This means using the least amount of force possible and only when necessary. What is considered a good reason depends on the norms of the time and place. In the past, people have used this doctrine to justify wars for self-defense, to punish wrongs, and over religious differences. However, with the adoption of the U.N. Charter, the idea of a just war has lost its legal significance, and the Charter only allows the use of force in self-defense.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Just-war doctrine is a principle in international law that states a war should have a morally and legally sufficient cause and must be conducted with restraint. The reason for the war should be good enough, and the war should only use the least amount of force necessary.

For example, a war waged in self-defense or to punish wrongs can be considered justifiable. However, the use of force should be limited to what is necessary to achieve the goal.

Example: The United States' involvement in World War II is often cited as an example of a just war. The country entered the war after Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, which was seen as a morally and legally sufficient cause. The war was conducted with restraint, and the US only used the amount of force necessary to defeat the Axis powers.

The just-war doctrine has been invoked to justify wars over religious differences, to avenge injuries, and punish wrongs. However, what is considered morally or legally sufficient depends on the norms of a time and place.

just war | jus urbanorum praediorum

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.