Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

laches, estoppel by

Read a random definition: common nuisance

A quick definition of laches, estoppel by:

Estoppel is a legal term that means you can't say or do something that goes against what you've said or done before, or what has been established as true by law. It can also mean that you can't keep arguing about something that has already been decided. There are different types of estoppel, like when someone makes a false statement that causes someone else to believe something and act on it, or when someone doesn't speak up when they should have. Estoppel is used to prevent unfairness and protect people from being harmed by others' actions or words.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Estoppel is a legal principle that prevents a person from asserting a claim or right that contradicts what they have said or done before or what has been legally established as true. It can also prevent the relitigation of issues. There are different types of estoppel, including equitable estoppel, estoppel by deed, and collateral estoppel.

Example: If a person sells a car to someone and later claims that they still own the car, they may be estopped from making that claim if they had previously signed a document stating that they sold the car. This is an example of estoppel by deed.

Explanation: In this example, the person's previous statement in the document they signed prevents them from asserting a claim that contradicts it. The principle of estoppel prevents them from denying the truth of their previous statement.

la chambre des esteilles | Lackey claim

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.