Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Lawrence v. Texas

Read a random definition: instructed delegate

A quick definition of Lawrence v. Texas:

Lawrence v. Texas was a court case in 2003 where the Supreme Court of the United States made same-sex sexual activity legal in every state and territory. Before this, many states had laws that punished people for having same-sex relationships. The case was brought by two men who were arrested for having sex in their own home. The court ruled that people have the right to privacy and that the government cannot control what people do in their own homes. This decision helped pave the way for same-sex marriage to become legal in the United States.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Lawrence v. Texas (2003) is a landmark case in which the Supreme Court of the United States invalidated sodomy laws across the United States, making same-sex sexual activity legal in every state and United States territory. The court held that intimate consensual sexual conduct was part of the liberty protected by the substantive due process under the Fourteenth Amendment.

Example: Before Lawrence v. Texas, legal punishments for sodomy included fines, life prison sentences, or both. In 1998, John Geddes Lawrence Jr. was arrested and charged with "deviate sex" for having anal sex with his partner in their home in Texas. The case eventually made its way to the Supreme Court, which ruled that the Texas law criminalizing sodomy was unconstitutional.

Explanation: The example illustrates how Lawrence v. Texas invalidated sodomy laws and made same-sex sexual activity legal in every state and United States territory. The case also highlights how the court recognized intimate consensual sexual conduct as part of the liberty protected by the substantive due process under the Fourteenth Amendment.

lawful permanent resident (LPR) | lawsuit

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
the retroactive withdrawls really hurt me
made them question my ability to stick through law school
withdrawals in undergrad?
yeah 2 years of classes
Quillinit
11:57
ah you filed retro W's from classes in UG?
Quillinit
11:58
ah okay, sorry homie that's rough
it's fine i got into one of my top choices so im really happy
Quillinit
11:58
<3 happy for you
getting into cornell is hugeee
ayyyyy
Quillinit
11:59
^^^^^ would love to get into Cornell lmao
Quillinit
11:59
or anywhere!
you got it, believeeee
12:06
@letsseehowitgoesnow: you okay?
12:08
@ KnowledgeableRitzyWasp did u withdraw frm all your classes for two years or just a few? i have 2 W's
12:23
listening to the front bottoms at the gym again ist es over fur mich?
My wife and I saw TFB with manchester orchestra the night before thanksgiving a few years back and it was pretty damn choice
shaquilleoatmeal
12:27
yoo lets dawg what happened, you good?
12:28
breakup
12:28
happens to the best of us
12:28
@UnsuitableMaliciousHedgehog: that’s so fucking sick
rough night and morning with ex :/. we broke up but we live together
shaquilleoatmeal
12:29
damn ;/ it is break up season dawg, i'm sorry you're going through that
12:29
it really is breakup season
shaquilleoatmeal
12:29
i lived with my ex for 3 months after we broke up and it was brutal. If you can move out quicker rather than later
thanks shaq! i just needed some input from people who are looking from the outside in
im gonna pack up my stuff and leave for a few days when i get off work
12:31
sometimes I think about things my ex said and did to me and a year later it still makes me so sad that I ever let myself be treated that way
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.