Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

leading question

Read a random definition: de coelo usque ad inferos

A quick definition of leading question:

A leading question is a type of question that suggests the answer in its form. It is not allowed during direct questioning of a witness, but it is allowed during cross-examination. There are specific situations where leading questions are appropriate, such as when dealing with difficult witnesses or preliminary matters.

A more thorough explanation:

A leading question is a type of question that suggests the answer to the person being asked. This type of question is not allowed during direct examination in court, but it is allowed during cross-examination. According to Rule 611(c) of the Federal Rules of Evidence, leading questions are appropriate in certain situations, such as when dealing with preliminary matters, when there is difficulty eliciting testimony from a witness, and when a hostile or adverse witness is being questioned.

  • Leading question: "You saw the defendant steal the money, didn't you?"
  • Non-leading question: "What did you see the defendant do with the money?"

The first example is a leading question because it suggests that the defendant stole the money. The second example is a non-leading question because it does not suggest an answer and allows the witness to provide their own testimony.

Another example of a leading question could be: "You were at the scene of the crime, right?" This question suggests that the person being asked was present at the crime scene, which may not be true. A non-leading question would be: "Can you tell us where you were at the time of the crime?" This question allows the witness to provide their own testimony without being influenced by the question.

lead hazard | lease

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.