Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

leads doctrine

Read a random definition: latro

A quick definition of leads doctrine:

The leads doctrine is a rule in tax-evasion cases that requires the government to investigate all the leads that a taxpayer provides that are reasonably accessible and could prove their innocence. If the government fails to investigate these leads, the trial judge may assume that they are true and that the taxpayer is innocent.

A more thorough explanation:

The leads doctrine is a rule in tax law that requires the government to investigate all leads that could prove a taxpayer's innocence in a tax-evasion case. If the government fails to investigate these leads, the trial judge may presume that they are true and exonerating.

For example, suppose a taxpayer is accused of underreporting their income. The taxpayer provides the government with evidence that they received a large gift from a family member during the year in question. If the government fails to investigate this lead and instead relies solely on the evidence of underreporting, the trial judge may presume that the gift was indeed received and exonerate the taxpayer.

The leads doctrine ensures that the government thoroughly investigates all possible evidence before making a case against a taxpayer. This helps to prevent wrongful convictions and ensures that justice is served fairly.

lead-lag study | league

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
40-50 fed clerks is pretty cool
texaslawhopefully
20:29
That’s fair. Chicago though: https://www.law.uchicago.edu/clerkships
That's sweet. Again tho, unclear with Fedsoc tho. But u sounded like ur willing to go Fedsoc so ur set
lilypadfrog
20:31
yeah Tex is a fedsoc guy iirc
lilypadfrog
20:31
Is it really like no clerkship benefit at Chicago if you’re not conservative?
lilypadfrog
20:31
that seems crazy #tome
texaslawhopefully
20:32
No, at least from the two people I know there that’s false. I think it’s just something like Chicago for conservatives is on par with S whereas for liberals it’s below HYS but above CCNP
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
YRDSL
21:31
@texaslawhopefully: it's pretty funny how even in law journal articles people can't stop confusing Penn with Penn State
texaslawhopefully
21:40
lmfao I didn't even notice that
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.