Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

lex Hostilia de furtis

Read a random definition: demurrer

A quick definition of lex Hostilia de furtis:

Term: LEX HOSTILIA DE FURTIS

Definition: The lex Hostilia de furtis was a law in ancient Rome that allowed the state to prosecute someone for stealing on behalf of the owner if the owner was captive or abroad. This law affected legal actions called actiones legis, which required specific words to be used. These actions were later abolished by the leges Juliae.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: The lex Hostilia de furtis was a law in ancient Roman law that allowed the state to prosecute a person for theft on behalf of an owner who was captive or abroad. This law affected the actiones legis, which were legal actions that required the use of a fixed form of words.

Example: If a Roman citizen was captured by an enemy and their property was stolen while they were captive, the state could prosecute the thief on their behalf using the lex Hostilia de furtis. Similarly, if an owner was abroad and their property was stolen, the state could also prosecute the thief on their behalf.

Explanation: The lex Hostilia de furtis was designed to protect the property rights of Roman citizens who were unable to defend their property due to captivity or absence from the city. By allowing the state to prosecute thieves on their behalf, the law ensured that their property was not lost or stolen without consequence. The law also affected the actiones legis, which were legal actions that required a specific form of words to be used in court. This meant that the lex Hostilia de furtis was not only a substantive law but also a procedural law that governed how legal actions were conducted in ancient Rome.

lex Hortensia | lexical definition

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
21:52
i personally think it should be an 8 year term with a term limit of 3 terms. so 24 years total. and one's position can be given to another candidate as well, doesn't just always go to the incumbent
21:52
dont tell me my math is wrong im still tired
you don’t mess with the zohan is goated
glovediedthisishismom
21:52
fizzy bubbly
shaquilleoatmeal
21:53
@JumpySubsequentDolphin: you want straight up comedy or rom com?
JumpySubsequentDolphin
21:54
hmmm I think the people w me would prefer regular comedy
shaquilleoatmeal
21:54
you gotta reform congress, youd see the changes in the supreme court kick in
21:55
not to doom but there's no way conservatives would vote for a term limit on SCOTUS if the majority is going to rule in favor of conservative interests in a patterned way
21:56
for many people in politics, not just conservatives, the ends justify the means and the means could be anti-american if it means achieving a "patriotic" end so to speak
shaquilleoatmeal
21:56
crazy rich asians, due date (older side of movies), hit man
shaquilleoatmeal
21:57
actually scratch all that - watch no hard feelings
crazy rich asians is cracked
21:58
oh its so good
21:58
im probably going to take these comedy suggestions because it's just me alone until like december 1 or 2 i forgor
JumpySubsequentDolphin
21:58
@shaquilleoatmeal: my sister in law hated no hard feelings
JumpySubsequentDolphin
21:58
Constance Wu is so beautiful
i forgor
shaquilleoatmeal
21:59
damn what, i thought it was a funny movie
babycat
22:00
i went to this one club that’s in crazy rich Asians. the rooftop bar
@shaquilleoatmeal: It's not a bad article, but I still don't buy it because (a) I think it glosses over cases like Milligan way too quickly without even going into why there was an ideological split (which there was for a reason and that case did matter) and (b) I think the 3-3-3 court description is also grounded in the difference in jurisprudence between the two groups (and that they aligned on cases like the SFAA one could say more about the facts of the case, than jurisprudential differences)
babycat
22:00
It’s called ce la vie
@shaquilleoatmeal: I’ll also preface, I am a little biased—I’m a big fan of Sara Isgur and David French.
shaquilleoatmeal
22:03
^^ advisory opinions ?
shaquilleoatmeal
22:04
i was trying to get into that with scorp before lsd crashed
shaquilleoatmeal
22:04
not aware of Milligan - what was the split and why
Essentially if an Alabama redistricting map violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. It was 5-4 with Kavanaugh and Robert’s in the majority. A very important case.
@shaquilleoatmeal: yes! I love advisory opinions
shaquilleoatmeal
22:09
ahh wait i vaguely remember hearing about this, had to do with black belt and mobil i think? Ill have to go back and read it
shaquilleoatmeal
22:10
haha right on, i listen to advisory opinions during my workout when i get tired of tunes
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.