Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

living trust

Read a random definition: willful homicide

A quick definition of living trust:

A living trust is a type of trust where the person who creates it can change it or end it whenever they want. This is different from other types of trusts that cannot be changed once they are created. Living trusts can be helpful because they allow the person to add or remove things from the trust over time. However, living trusts may have more taxes and debts than other types of trusts. People might create living trusts to make sure their things are taken care of if they cannot do it themselves. Some people might use other types of trusts to help them make money.

A more thorough explanation:

A living trust, also known as a revocable trust, is a type of trust where the person who creates the trust (the settlor) can change or end the trust at any time. This is different from an irrevocable trust, where the settlor cannot make changes once the trust is created.

Living trusts can be used for many reasons. They offer flexibility, allowing the settlor to add or remove assets from the trust as needed. They can also be used to ensure that the settlor's assets are managed properly if they become unable to do so themselves.

However, living trusts may come with higher tax and creditor liability than irrevocable trusts. It's important to consider these factors before creating a living trust.

For example, John creates a living trust and puts his house and savings into the trust. He can change the trust at any time, and he can also use the assets in the trust during his lifetime. If John becomes unable to manage his assets, the trustee of the trust can step in and manage them for him.

Another example is Sarah, who creates a living trust to hold her investments. She can add or remove investments from the trust as needed, and she can also change the terms of the trust if her circumstances change.

These examples illustrate how living trusts offer flexibility and control to the settlor, but also come with potential drawbacks such as tax and creditor liability.

lives in being | living will

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.