Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

loss of bargain rule

Read a random definition: judices

A quick definition of loss of bargain rule:

The loss of bargain rule is a legal principle that says if someone breaks a contract or lies about something in a contract, the person who was hurt should get enough money to make up for what they lost. This means they should be in the same position they would have been in if the contract had been followed or if the lie had been true. For example, if someone sold a house and lied about its condition, the person who bought the house could get money to make up for the difference between what the house is worth now and what it would have been worth if it had been in the condition the seller said it was in. This is called the loss of bargain rule.

A more thorough explanation:

The loss of bargain rule is a legal principle that applies in cases of breach of contract or contract fraud. It states that the damages awarded to the injured party should be enough to put them in the same position they would have been in if the contract had been fulfilled as promised or if the fraudulent representation had been true.

For example, if a person buys a house based on the fraudulent representation that it has a new roof, but later discovers that the roof is old and needs to be replaced, the loss of bargain rule would require the seller to compensate the buyer for the difference in value between the house with a new roof and the house with an old roof.

The loss of bargain rule is designed to ensure that parties to a contract are held accountable for their promises and that the injured party is not left worse off as a result of the breach or fraud.

loss damage waiver (LDW) | loss of consortium

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.