A more thorough explanation:

Loving v. Virginia is a landmark case in the United States that was decided by the Supreme Court in 1967. The case was about a couple, Richard Loving, who was white, and Mildred Jeter, who was African American. They got married in Washington D.C., but when they moved to Virginia, they were arrested and sentenced to one year in jail for violating Virginia's law that prohibited interracial marriage.

The Lovings sued the state of Virginia, arguing that the law violated their constitutional rights. The Supreme Court agreed with them and struck down the law, ruling that state laws prohibiting interracial marriage violated the Equal Protection Clause and Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

The Court found that Virginia's law served no legitimate state purpose and was instead a thinly veiled attempt to further white supremacy. The Court recognized that state laws prohibiting interracial marriage were passed as a reaction to slavery and that Virginia's purpose of preserving racial purity was a violation of the Constitution.

Loving v. Virginia was a significant victory for civil rights and helped pave the way for greater equality in the United States.

Example: - Richard Loving, a white man, and Mildred Jeter, an African American woman, got married in Washington D.C. - When they moved to Virginia, they were arrested and sentenced to one year in jail for violating Virginia's law that prohibited interracial marriage. - The Supreme Court struck down the law, ruling that state laws prohibiting interracial marriage violated the Equal Protection Clause and Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Explanation: The example illustrates how Loving v. Virginia was a case about a couple who faced discrimination because of their race. The example also shows how the Supreme Court's decision helped to protect the constitutional rights of individuals and promote greater equality in the United States.