Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Loving v. Virginia

Read a random definition: certworthy

A quick definition of Loving v. Virginia:

Loving v. Virginia was a court case in 1967 where a white man named Richard Loving and an African American woman named Mildred Jeter got married in Washington D.C. but were arrested when they moved to Virginia because it was against the law for people of different races to get married there. The Supreme Court decided that this law was not fair and violated the rights of the Lovings and other people who wanted to marry someone of a different race. The Court said that the law was based on racism and did not have a good reason to exist. This decision helped to make it legal for people of different races to get married all across the United States.

A more thorough explanation:

Loving v. Virginia is a landmark case in the United States that was decided by the Supreme Court in 1967. The case was about a couple, Richard Loving, who was white, and Mildred Jeter, who was African American. They got married in Washington D.C., but when they moved to Virginia, they were arrested and sentenced to one year in jail for violating Virginia's law that prohibited interracial marriage.

The Lovings sued the state of Virginia, arguing that the law violated their constitutional rights. The Supreme Court agreed with them and struck down the law, ruling that state laws prohibiting interracial marriage violated the Equal Protection Clause and Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

The Court found that Virginia's law served no legitimate state purpose and was instead a thinly veiled attempt to further white supremacy. The Court recognized that state laws prohibiting interracial marriage were passed as a reaction to slavery and that Virginia's purpose of preserving racial purity was a violation of the Constitution.

Loving v. Virginia was a significant victory for civil rights and helped pave the way for greater equality in the United States.

Example: - Richard Loving, a white man, and Mildred Jeter, an African American woman, got married in Washington D.C. - When they moved to Virginia, they were arrested and sentenced to one year in jail for violating Virginia's law that prohibited interracial marriage. - The Supreme Court struck down the law, ruling that state laws prohibiting interracial marriage violated the Equal Protection Clause and Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Explanation: The example illustrates how Loving v. Virginia was a case about a couple who faced discrimination because of their race. The example also shows how the Supreme Court's decision helped to protect the constitutional rights of individuals and promote greater equality in the United States.

Louisiana | low-profit limited liability company (L3C)

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
12:34
gotchu
hello friends
13:09
Yo
lawguy we're nearly stats twins :D
13:13
I saw that, and I saw you got the Georgetown interview invite yesterday too! Goodluck!
you too haha, i was super surprised to have received one so early not gonna lie
i heard the group interview is really chill and I'm kinda excited to do it
seems cool
13:14
Yeah, 7sage has a page that talks about the questions for each schools interview, GULC's seems unique
13:15
Idk how much of an effect it has on admissions chances but should be cool either way
ive heard the conversion rate for gulc group interview is pretty high even moreso if you have the stats
it's hard to say but i've also heard that the group interview is harder to get than the alumni interview. but who really knows tbh
im p sure they don't interview everyone and getting one this early should be a great sign!
13:16
Yeah I've heard the same ab the group interview
13:17
So maybe I'll see you in D.C. a year from now lmao
initiallaw
13:32
Speaking of stat twins kazuyamishima were exact stat twins lol
17:13
Anyone going to the UGA zoom thing on the 22nd?
17:16
My bad, 24th*
Idk, what's it for?
@Law-Guy: How'd you get the Vandy fee waiver?
17:32
What does going ur3 in 3 days mean at Uva 😅
that you will get UR2 in 3 more
17:33
somethings gotta give
I’m new. What’s the UR and UR2?
17:35
I already went ur2. It’s the 3rd status date change
17:35
@RustyWrangler: attend one of their virtual info sessions and they'll send you a fee waiver
@Law-Guy: Awesome, thanks! I'll sign up rn!
i'm not entirely sure
They've recently been sending a lot of interview invites
It means status change?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.